MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
War on Terrorism (Politics)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 142, 143, 144  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Russia and Iran have been the big losers in the Syrian volte face but, to a degree, Israel as well. The difference is that Russia and Iran are already on the rivet, they have to constantly rob Peter to pay Paul. The difference between Russia and Iran is that Russia is always that way.

The difference between Israel and the other two is that she is in that rare position of the upward-bound hegemon for whom every turn of the wheel, for or against, presents new opportunities. (China is in that position too.)

America was the opposite, the hegemon on the way out for whom everything, for or against, presented a crisis ratcheting things down. Except Trump has changed that. Whether his policy of refusing to recognise reality is a temporary halt or a stroke of genius will only be known by our children's children.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Chutzpah News

Israel has formally protested about an Iranian drone hitting a hospital in a Tel Aviv suburb.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

'I'm no friend of Netanyahu.' Jon Pearce MP Labour Friends of Israel, on Newsnight

Fair enough, Jon, but the problem the rest of us have is that Israel keeps on electing Netanyahu to be its prime minister, and he keeps on doing horrible things. Love him or loathe him, the Israeli people don't seem to be busting a gut to stop him doing them. And, you'd have to agree, things are getting worse rather than better.

If you could indicate at what point you will cease to be a friend of Israel, we could judge whether to sign up or not. Because at the moment, speaking for myself, I have to say I am bordering on being a Friend of Anti-Semitism.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Which country, or movement, or organisation in that area, has better people or better leaders in charge than Israel?

OK they might be total bastards, but they once again seem effective at it.

It's not a safe space........so stopping horrible things happening again after the humiliation of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, is what was needed.

They have taken out the leadership of Hamas, Hezbollah and are now going after Iran.

Respect is what they are after, rather than friendship.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Which country, or movement, or organisation in that area, has better people or better leaders in charge than Israel?

Israel is miles ahead of everyone in all aspects of statecraft.

OK they might be total bastards, but they once again seem effective at it.

I'm certainly not arguing with you there.

It's not a safe space........so stopping horrible things happening again after the humiliation of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, is what was needed.

I'm not an expert on the Jewish psyche, so I'll take your word for this.

They have taken out the leadership of Hamas, Hezbollah and are now going after Iran.

Look, ma, clean hands. Been washing them since 1948, ma, ain't I a good boy?

Respect is what they are after, rather than friendship.

Soon be washing them in the Tigris/Euphrates, ma.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Everyone keeps referring to the Israel/Iran War, but is it? It has more the nature of a police action. A colonial power sending a column of pith helmets 'upcountry' to confiscate assegais and hang a few tribal leaders to send a message not to do it again.

Could work. The Iranians are not what you would call 'a proud people', are they? They are well behind China in being the second longest independent state in the history of humanity.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Well up to Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, Wiley would say things were going remarkably well for Iran, they might be bastards (from a humanitarian viewpoint) but they were well respected Persian chess-playing strategic bastards. They had in effect developed the land bridge to the Mediterranean by their actions in Iraq, Lebanon and Syria, their axis of resistance comprising Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and parts of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) in Iraq, was undeniably very effective, both in terms of resistance and in the pursuit of Iranian ends.

I guess they thought that destabilising Israel was the next logical step.

It still wasn't going that badly until the Hezbollah pager attacks, and the fall of Assad.

Now its axis of resistance/front line of defence appears in ruins. They are no longer doing the destabalising. They are all going backwards (except the Houthis), they are now the ones confronting the existential threat.

Not good.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

So President Trump decided not to extend his two week ultimatum past two days. He's not a man blessed with patience. I just hope Diego Garcia wasn't used by the B-2 grim reapers because the Islamic states of the world are meeting right now in Istanbul and they are saying to one another

"Entre nous, we're jolly glad the Iranian nukes are out of the way, they've been nothing but trouble, but the way those Christians and Jews did it is so egregious we're just going to have to declare an open-ended jihad. The Street will demand no less."
Send private message
Ishmael


In: Toronto
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
So President Trump decided not to extend his two week ultimatum past two days.

The Iranians took less than 24 hours to explicitly reject his offer.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

At least the offer was explicit. The 'sixty days' was clearly an afterthought when someone noticed Trump had mentioned 'a couple of months' and the Israelis started bombing sixty-one days later. Nobody, least of all the Iranians, were aware the clock was counting down.

But this is all pretty monumental stuff. Remember, the USA has just bombed the bejesus out of a country that has not done anything wrong in terms of international law. The USA itself had signed up to Iran's right to enrich uranium. Nor had Iran done anything (lately) to the USA. Only Israel had the dubious right to take out the Iranian nuclear industry on the grounds of 'its existential existence'.

If Trump had decided that, as World Policeman, the USA had the right--even the duty--to eliminate the Iranian nuclear industry, he might have given them the chance to do it of their own accord. True, they wouldn't have done so but it was catastrophic to do it with a surprise attack as though it was Bin Laden or Saddam Hussein they'd just found hiding in a hole.

For Chrissake, the Iranians have been down that hole, in plain sight, enriching uranium since 2003. He couldn't wait two weeks?
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I don't beleve in any of these Trump deadlines anymore.

Nevertheless, the spokeslady did say "within two weeks" and it actually was....was this the one time he did what he said?
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote


For Chrissake, the Iranians have been down that hole, in plain sight, enriching uranium since 2003. He couldn't wait two weeks?


It wasn't until 2008-9 that intelligence revealed that Fordow was a massive nuclear enrichment plant. In 2009 this fact was revealed at a Group of 7 summit in Pittsburgh by President Barack Obama, along with the leaders of Britain and France. It is widely believed that this was the result of Alireza Akbari spying for Britain. He was in fact later executed for spying for Britain by the Iranians. The FO won't comment so we cant be sure. Prior to that Fordow was thought by the west to be for military storage. Nobody ever considered it was 300 feet underground nuclear enrichment plant but for civilian use, as far as Wiley can see.

Perhaps the Iranians were doing it for safety reasons rather than. say. build an external casing?
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The Iranians have absolutely no interest in civilian nuclear power. The Russians built them a small nuke power station, I assume because it was a badge of modernity. They have a small interest in enriching uranium because they've got some uranium mines and an even smaller need for medical isotopes and what not. But it's all a total waste of money for a country in Iran's state of development. Much better to look in Exchange & Mart.

However they discovered, as many do, that you can endlessly tweak the nose of the world community by 'going for a bomb'. You might even end up with one, you never can tell.

There is no safety reason for building things under three hundred feet of rock unless you misstep and the world community takes you seriously. And very effective it is too. I predict the Americans won't have harmed a hair on a single centrifuge's head.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The world waits. The Iranians have carefully signalled--by telling the Americans where they were going to fire their 'retaliatory' missiles and by using the exact number of missiles that the Americans used bombs-- that they are prepared to call it a day.

This leaves the ball in (a) the American and (b) the Israeli court. If the Big Two (I'm including the USA) agree, then peace and quiet reigns. If one or other of them doesn't, then we're in for exciting times. Do you get the impression the Israelis (for one) are in favour of quiet times?
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

According to Bibi all the objectives of Rising Lion have been achieved and there is ceasefire.

If it holds we can expect to see all sides declare victory followed by a massive crackdown on the enemy within.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 142, 143, 144  Next

Jump to:  
Page 143 of 144

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group