| View previous topic :: View next topic |
Brian Ambrose
|
|
 |
|
Covid, the whole truth
The political navel-picking inquiry over the lockdown grinds on but the bigger scandal about the disease is excluded: the origin of Covid, the true risk for the healthy, the politicising of medical care, the safety and efficacy of the experimental mRNA ‘vaccines’, the fear mongering by government and media, the curtailment of basic freedoms, the cause of the current medical crisis. To mention a few.
This is not just my story. Why did you accept the jab or, like me, decline? How did that decision affect you? What memories stand out from the whole bizarre Covid saga? Let’s record some thoughts before we forget the time when a nation lost a grip on reason. The epidemic was not just a disease of the body.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Boreades
In: finity and beyond
|
|
|
|
It's a long and winding road.
Alarm bells first started ringing for me way back in 2019/20
For Brits, here’s an accountability question:
| Where did the Lockdown policy come from? |
It wasn’t just the hapless Neil Ferguson. This was pushed at government level. But which level? Alarmist headlines from the MSM declared
| “Coronavirus could kill half a million Britons and infect 80% of population”. |
Who sent out the information that led to those headlines that created demand for the government to ‘do something’? Which led directly to the lockdown, the cancellation of appointments and the emptying of hospitals.
Turns out it was the National Security Communications Team issued the directive to the media.
| What is the NSCT? It was reported in May 2018 “Government boosts capability to combat international threats…catching up with NATO allies which have impressive ‘war rooms’. The UK Government Communication Plan 2019/2020 also mentioned the NSCT would increase public resilience to disinformation. |
So a Government Military/Security unit set up to counter fake news was instead used to create the COVID narrative, building public demand for the lockdown.
| A government document, Controlling The Narrative, in March 2018 established the FUSION DOCTRINE and the NSCT. This was followed in April by the Rapid Response and in July 2018 by the Rapid Response Mechanism proposed by Theresa May to ensure all European governments spoke with one voice. The bureaucrat in command of all this was Mark Sedwill, as head of the Civil Service and of the Cabinet Office which answers not to Parliament but directly to the Privy Council. |
Sedwill was also National Security Adviser in control of all the Intel agencies, the new BioSecurity Center, as well as the Rapid Response Unit/NSCT, 77th Brigade, and the 13th Signals Regiment.
Responsibility for Lockdown and consequences thus flowed like this:
Mark Sedwill –> Rapid Response Unit –> National Security Communications Team –> MSM –> pressure on PM Boris Johnson
None of this was Public Health or Medical advice in response to a "natural" source.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Boreades
In: finity and beyond
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Boreades
In: finity and beyond
|
|
|
|
The conflicts of interest were swept under the carpet.
| UK’s chief scientific adviser has £600k shareholding in firm contracted to develop vaccines |
Chief scientific adviser = Sir Patrick Vallance
| according to an investigation published today Sir Patrick, who also chairs the Government’s expert advisory panel on vaccines, holds a deferred bonus of 43,111 shares in GSK worth £600,000 from his time as president of the multinational drug company. | |
|
| |
|
|
|
Boreades
In: finity and beyond
|
|
|
|
Another big rabbit hole:
| Are the vaccines gene therapy? |
MSM told us no, nothing to see here.
| A Reuters ‘fact check‘ from August, for instance, concludes: “Scientists told Reuters that while mRNA vaccines can be considered ‘genetic-based therapy’ because they use genetic code from COVID-19, they are not technically gene therapy. This is because the mRNA does not change the body’s genetic makeup.” |
But it represents a sleight of hand introduced during the pandemic, in part at the behest of vaccine-maker Moderna in order to avoid the new vaccines having the negative associations of gene therapy.
Found in an article in Nature in June 2021:
| However, these mRNA vaccines, which have been developed and approved within a few months, signify a breakthrough in the field of gene therapy, which has battled to achieve ordinary acknowledgement due to a large number of sceptical and conservative scientists and other claimed safety and translational concerns. Although these two vaccines are not the first approved drugs utilising genetic materials as active ingredients, they are believed to be a milestone in modern medical history that may forever change pharmaceutical approaches. … |
And
| This unprecedented achievement will also stress the crucial solutions that gene therapy may provide for many diseases. In the coming future, we expect to see a considerable effort for developing mRNA-based treatments for a wide range of diseases, e.g., hereditary disorders, type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, cancer, and HIV. Many other mRNA vaccines may also turn into reality for preventing infectious diseases and epidemics for being scalable, reproducible, versatile, and adaptable with different viruses’ variants. mRNA vaccines provide flexibility to be modified if any new virus variants may appear; thus, producing new forms of the vaccine within a few weeks. This is a great opportunity for the FDA and EMA to revise the drug development pipeline to make it more flexible and less time-consuming. |
Ref: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41435-021-00136-6
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Boreades
In: finity and beyond
|
|
|
|
Then there was the remarkably fast speed at which these "new vaccines" appeared. In just a few months, compared to years or even decades for other vaccines.
Some noticed "it didn't smell right". Understanding that came from a classic case of "follow the money".
| Evidence given to the German-led international Corona Investigative Committee on Friday July 9 by Dr David Martin, who runs a US company monitoring innovations relevant to financial interests. |
Dr David Martin's business routinely monitors the financial value of patents, including pharma patents. He said a review of more than 4,000 patents issued around the SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) coronavirus had led to the dramatic conclusion:
How so?
All of the virus sequences that we're now being told are "novel viruses" have been found in patent applications, going back as far as 1999.
| The declaration of a novel virus was entirely a fallacy. There was no novel Corona virus. There are countless very subtle modifications of Corona virus sequences that have been uploaded. But there was no single identified novel Corona virus at all. As a matter of fact, we found records, in the patent records, of sequences attributed to novelty, going to patents that were sought as early as 1999. So not only was this not a novel anything, it's not been novel for over two decades. |
When was the first Corona virus patented?
| Up to 1999, the activity around patented viruses was uniquely applied to veterinary sciences. The first vaccine ever patented for Corona viruses was actually sought by Pfizer ... which was specifically this S-spike protein. So the exact same thing that we have allegedly rushed into invention. The first application was filed January 28th 2000, twenty one years ago. So the idea that we mysteriously stumbled on the way to intervene on vaccines is not only ludicrous, it is incredulous. |
Because Timothy Miller, Sharon Klepfer, Albert Paul Read and Elaine Joans, on Jan 28th 2000, filed what was ultimately issued as US patent # 6372224 which was the Spike Protein Virus Vaccine for the Canine Corona Virus.
| What’s more problematic, and what is actually, the most egregious problem is that Anthony Fauci and AID found the malleability of Corona virus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines. And so SARS is actually not a natural progression of a zoonotic modification of Corona virus. As a matter of fact and very specifically in 1999 Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, specifically to create - and you cannot help but you know lament what I’m about to read, because this comes directly from a patent application filed on April 19th 2002 – and you heard the date correctly – 2002 – where the NIAID built “an infectious replication defective Corona virus”. They were specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. |
In other words, we made SARS. And we patented it on April 19th 2002. Before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia. Which as you know followed that by several months. |
| That patent, issued as US patent 7279327, that patent clearly lays out, in very specific gene sequencing, the fact that we knew that the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding domain, the S1 spike protein and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory, using nothing more than gene-sequencing technologies, taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen. | |
|
| |
|
|
|
Boreades
In: finity and beyond
|
|
|
|
When did it start getting personal for me?
It was just around the time we were all being encouraged to bang our saucepans to help protect the NHS.
Who else remembers that pantomine now?
Our local NHS hospital protected itself by dumping the elderly and infirm into local care homes and hospices. With orders that the local GPs should not visit these people. Even for remedial care.
Our local hospice is a small charity. It had been the final home for several close friends and neighbours. Cared for in a dignified compassionate way, with death as a peaceful outcome.
Up to then, the hospice just about broke even every year. With 75% of its income from donations, only 25% from NHS.
Covid broke it financially. As a place that really did care, and took the people the NHS was ejecting (to save the NHS), its emergency service costs put it over £2 million in debt. The NHS refused to pay a penny more on top of what was contracted.
The directors of the hospice tell me this story was repeated at many other similar places around the UK. But because it doesn't fit the MSM narrative, it's hard to get any publicity to try and raise more donations. The local BBC radio declined to cover the story.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Brian Ambrose
|
|
|
|
Well said Borry, and thank you. You’ve hit quite a number of my balls for six, so I’ll need to rewrite a couple of my prepared posts. I am relieved that you are as angry as me. Everybody should be angry, not just for the past but for the continuing cover-up.
Save the NHS! What shit. We pay them to do the saving. I am embarrassed that I actually went outside and clapped the NHS while all the time treatment was withheld until at death’s door, A&Es were all but closed, hospital wards were half empty and medical staff were so bored they danced and made videos. You probably remember of the man who filmed the empty corridors of his local hospital and security men outside A&E. He was told it was illegal to be there and warned he would be arrested.
Since you have mentioned the psychopath Fauci I guess you have read The Real Anthony Fauci by RFK Jr. I made a comment two days about a hit piece on RFK Jr - I mentioned the name of the ‘journalist’, Kennedy, and the book (gently suggesting she might learn something.) They deleted it. I tried again but without the word Fauci. Deleted. That’s the Telegraph.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
Of course I've read the Real Anthony Fauci. It's brilliant and if 10% is true we might as well shut down most medical research.
Even scarier is why RFK has been allowed to become Secretary of Health.
This is the man who believes that his father was not killed by a lone gunman, but instead was killed by a conspiracy designed to stop him from investigating his brother's murder.
Now before he was given the job he had to be confirmed by the Senate. Any one of the senators interviewing him could have destroyed him by just asking, "Who killed your father?" BUT THIS WAS TOTALLY IGNORED.
The senators must have been told to avoid the question at all cost.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Boreades
In: finity and beyond
|
|
|
|
There's so many more threads to this obscene tapestry. I will just make a few brief notes while I remember each issue. If I may, I will come back later with more complete coverage of each.
1 - US-based EcoHealth Alliance funneled millions of US taxpayer dollars as grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology prior to the pandemic. What for? Gain of function experiments on bat-based coronaviruses.
2 - Eco Health planned to sequence the spike protein from coronaviruses obtained from bats for the purpose of “creating mutants to identify how significantly each would need to evolve to use ACE2,” which is explained as “the receptor to gain entry to human cells.”
3 - Thanks to several US FOI requests, it is now a matter of public record that Anthony Fauci, Jeremy Farrar and other Western scientists organised a scientific cover-up of evidence that might implicate their complicity in the gain-of-function research that they suspected may have created the virus.
4 - Very few effective clinical trials were done. Some results were falsified or distorted e.g. the effects of the vaccine on pregnant women. No trials were done on very young children, because they were in the age group at least risk.
5 - Authorisation for the release of the vaccine was based on the production methods used for the very low volumes needed for research and clinical trials. After authorisation, the production method was changed to use e-Coli.
6 - People were promised by our "leaders" that the vaccine would prevent people getting Covid. It did not. People still got infected.
7 - Medically-reliable evidence that the infection rate was higher among vaccinated people than the unvaccinated was distorted or suppressed.
8 - Public Health policy was that face masks had negligible benefit, then did a complete U-turn. Evidence of the negligible benefit was suppressed.
9 - Any talk about the effectiveness of cheap off-patent and Over The Counter medicines was heretical and could get you banned, or struck-off as a doctor.
10 - No business case of the social and economic cost of Lockdown was ever conducted. The cure was worse than the disease.
11 - PCR tests were scientifically meaningless. Kary Mullis was the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993. He regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection like Covid.
12 - Various meta-tests put the PCR False Positive rate higher than 50%, Making it the flip of a coin. Also, this test cannot rule out a positive result caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
Let's call that "The Dirty Dozen" for now. I may recall more. That's enough from me for one night. I may now need to self-medicate with some wine.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Boreades
In: finity and beyond
|
|
|
|
For anyone who wants to look (and most people don't)
Many useful references are at
Evidence Not Fear
Referenced and sourced COVID-19 information
https://evidencenotfear.com/
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Boreades
In: finity and beyond
|
|
|
|
Neil Ferguson (Professor Pantsdown) deserves special mention. Not just for how crap his theoretical modelling was. But especially that he was a serial offender of producing crap models that bore no relation to reality. Examples go back to the Foot & Mouth era.
But if he was such an idiot, why did the DoH keep using him? Because he was a Useful Idiot, good at producing fear-porn to frighten people. Which fits in with the Nudge Unit modus operandi.
Plus he was caught breaking the lockdown rules (like a few others). The MSM gave them a hard time. How very dare they break these rules? The answer is simple - they were all in a position to know the rules were a useless sham.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin
In: London
|
|
|
|
|
While our knights errant go off on their errants, I ought to point out that contemporary musings on Covid are to be found in the latter half of the 'The Flu' thread in this section. It says a lot for the dimness of the people who run this outfit they didn't think Covid warranted a thread of its own. It does now.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Brian Ambrose
|
|
|
|
|
When the Wuhan lab virus was released, a coordinated plan of fear and control was rolled out. I don’t know if it was an accident or not, but it is a fact that key people were, long before, planning for a worldwide shutdown that turned out exactly as they expected. The professors had the culprit - a bat travelled 1000 miles from a cave in a jungle, avoiding any human contact, until it found home in a food market in Wuhan which doesn’t sell bats. With my tin hat on, as soon as I heard there was a lab researching dangerous viruses nearby, I knew what really had happened. Of course now everyone knows, apart from Anthony Fauci and a friend of mine (but then he also doesn’t believe a third skyscraper fell down in 911 so nowadays we stick to discussing things like the weather.)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin
In: London
|
|
|
|
| Brian Ambrose wrote: | | When the Wuhan lab virus was released |
Could you perhaps make clear what 'released' means in this context?
| a coordinated plan of fear and control was rolled out. |
I missed that but then I don't have Brian's access to the inner workings of the Chinese government.
| I don’t know if it was an accident or not |
Everyone else knows it was an accident.
But it is a fact that key people were, long before, planning for a worldwide shutdown that turned out exactly as they expected.
|
Could you perhaps make clear what 'it is a fact' means in this context?
| The professors had the culprit - a bat travelled 1000 miles from a cave in a jungle, avoiding any human contact, until it found home in a food market in Wuhan which doesn’t sell bats. |
Ah yes, 'the professors'. Were they linked in a cabal of some kind?
With your tin foil hat on.
| as soon as I heard there was a lab researching dangerous viruses nearby, I knew what really had happened. |
We all managed to make that connection.
| Of course now everyone knows, apart from Anthony Fauci and a friend of mine (but then he also doesn’t believe a third skyscraper fell down in 911 so nowadays we stick to discussing things like the weather.) |
No chance of that here.
PS Could you make your paragraphs longer? It makes it easier to dismiss you as a nutjob.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
The Library Index 
FAQ 
Search
Register
Profile 
Log in to check your private messages 
Log in 
