MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
War on Terrorism (Politics)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 130, 131, 132 ... 135, 136, 137  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
I can't believe this is the result of wisdom dawning so it is probably logistical.


The US will no longer ask the UK for help as it's telling Europeans they must defend Europe as they, the US, are withdrawing from Europe.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

It's the end of the special relationship. Britain and the Houthis.

Is Rishi Sunak a Houthi? Jan 24, 2024
If he is a plant he is certainly doing a brilliant job.

Sending Typhoons from Cyprus to bomb people driving around in pick-ups with drones in the back is proving a tough ask but each time ‘Rishi’ orders it, a million Yemenis hit the streets declaring death to the British and undying loyalty to the Houthi cause. One wonders how often he can get away with it before the British intelligence services smell a rat.

However, despite their coup, the Houthi intelligence services can be justly criticised for giving their man a less than believable legend:

Southampton pharmacist marries billionaire’s daughter and becomes British prime minister after four prime ministers are removed in quick succession and in unusual circumstances.

Just because it worked doesn’t make it copy book. Thank God there are still patriots left in Parliament who are trying to get Rishi removed. Only eleven of them so far, according to the BBC, but it’s a start.

“Houthis, get off our lawn! Stick to you own neck of the woods.”
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
Why does everyone keep saying

"While President Putin hasn't agreed to a full ceasefire, he has agreed to..."

He hasn't agreed to any ceasefire, period. Not attacking energy infrastructure is nothing to do with any ceasefire.


Agreed, it's all talks about talks.

However, for some reason, poor old Neville Chamberlain comes to mind. Widely ridiculed by historians for his "Peace In Our Time" speech, waving a piece of paper. But he actually achieved what we desperately needed (or hoped for). An apparent pause in the hostilities, giving us time and breathing space to scale-up our production of military materiel.

Trump, loudly blowing his own trumpet, may be hoping for a win-win. Get the huge PR bonus of "the man that made a peace deal", while simultaneously letting the Ukraine rebuild its stock levels ready for "the next big push".
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

It's not as if Trump doesn't have recent experience of the way thirty day ceasefires are supposed to work. You may have forgotten--he certainly has--but a thirty-day ceasefire was brokered between Israel and Hamas. To be followed by Stage Two, essentially the end of the war.

Israel proceeded to break every undertaking it had made and when Hamas nevertheless expressed itself ready to move on to Stage Two, the Israelis and Trump castigated Hamas for breaking the terms of the ceasefire (from memory, it was misidentifying for twenty-four hours a hostage corpse but it was difficult to follow the Israeli/American reasoning) so there could be no Stage Two at this stage.

Innocents might assume this would mean returning to the ceasefire but to Israel it meant a return to war. Since Trump is an innocent, Israel explained it meant a ceasefire, except they could treat Gaza as a free-fire zone but woe betide Hamas if it broke the ceasefire by fighting back. Unless Hamas mended their ways, Netanyahu and Trump agreed, Stage One will have to be extended indefinitely, meaning no end to the war.

Something like that. I try to keep up but the Israelis are too serpentine even for cleverclogs me. Or too wicked. Not Trump though. He's too dumb to be wicked.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Borry wrote:
However, for some reason, poor old Neville Chamberlain comes to mind. Widely ridiculed by historians for his "Peace In Our Time" speech, waving a piece of paper.

The same people who were all for it at the time. Everyone was, bar the usual far lefties like Michael Foot and war-freaks like Winston Churchill. People, including and especially historians, forget there was no alternative to Appeasement at the time. You can't go to war when no-one wants to go to war. War being something of a collective enterprise.

But he actually achieved what we desperately needed (or hoped for). An apparent pause in the hostilities

What hostilities? Germany beating the drum over the Sudetenland, you mean?

giving us time and breathing space to scale-up our production of military materiel.

Giving Germany the breathing space it needed to scale up production, as it turned out.

Trump, loudly blowing his own trumpet, may be hoping for a win-win. Get the huge PR bonus of "the man that made a peace deal", while simultaneously letting the Ukraine rebuild its stock levels ready for "the next big push".

I hadn't realised he was that subtle but more strength to his elbow in that case.
Send private message
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
Israel proceeded to break every undertaking it had made and when Hamas nevertheless expressed itself ready to move on to Stage Two, the Israelis and Trump castigated Hamas for breaking the terms of the ceasefire (from memory, it was misidentifying for twenty-four hours a hostage corpse but it was difficult to follow the Israeli/American reasoning) so there could be no Stage Two at this stage.

The Israeli government's latest violation of the cease-fire agreement makes no mention of the misidentified Palestinian corpse, it is purely a decision to resume the war (as stated more than once), to the dismay of Ha'aretz, Israel's liberal /left-wing newspaper

The declared premise for breaking the cease-fire – that extreme military pressure will force Hamas into capitulation, and will lead to hostages being released alive – is false and illogical. Sixteen months of war has shown that only negotiations bring back significant numbers of hostages alive, that airstrikes kill them, and Hamas, which has repopulated its ranks, has no pangs of conscience to fight to the last Gazan.
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
I hadn't realised he was that subtle but more strength to his elbow in that case.


There might be more than one set of people pulling the strings.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

If there were I would be somewhat mollified. However Trump is not what you would call 'collegiate'. He is like an old-fashioned monarch presiding over a court as well as a country. Not like, say, Henry VIII who chose his favourites for their administrative abilities but like, say, Charles I. He ended up with a triumvirate of favourites consisting of Strafford, Laud and the Queen who pulled him in three different directions simultaneously.

Choosing one favourite and leaving him to be Grand Vizier was the normal French and Spanish royal method. (And Hanoverian?) For an American royal presidential court, the nearest maybe would be the Nixon White House.

Of course Trump will only be king for four years and it is early doors to play favourites ourselves. I can't, for example, see Musk lasting. It also has to be borne in mind that Trump has more self-confidence because of his first term (when he didn't have favourites) and re-election. But he is eight years older and not eight years wiser. As ever, he is unpredictable.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The reason I left Medium is because of the lack of traction I acquired despite years of unstinting efforts. Here's a case in point. A brilliant and original piece that got precisely two reads and no comments. It arose out of something I wrote here at the AEL so judge for yourself whether it deserved better.
---------------

Ex-STASI hood gets ten years Feb 24, 2025
Not the medal he should have got

A German court has sentenced a former STASI agent to ten years for murder after a team of historians, journalists and forensic epigraphists painstakingly tracked down the East German security man responsible for killing in cold blood a young man whose only crime was trying to escape to the West.

It is a total load of old bollocks.

In 1974 a Polish citizen, Czeslaw Kukuczka, made his way to the Polish embassy in East Berlin carrying a bag with wires sticking out of it. He claimed it was a bomb and threatened to blow up the building unless he was allowed to cross into West Berlin. The embassy staff contacted East German security (the STASI) and were told to take him by car to a railway tunnel linking East and West Berlin.

Mr Kukuczka was told he was free to walk to a West Berlin railway station visible just up the track. As he did so Martin Naumann, a STASI officer, stepped out of the shadows and shot him dead. Summing up:

* Naumann was obeying a lawful order from his superiors. Anyone ‘crossing the Wall’ illegally was liable to be shot. Hundreds of people were shot by hundreds of East German border guards. It may have been reprehensible but it was not a crime. None of them have ever been prosecuted to my knowledge.

* Naumann was doing his duty at some risk to his own life. There was no guarantee both men would not die in an explosion. (The bomb was a dummy but nobody knew that.)

* Naumann was doing it in such a way that nobody could have been harmed save himself and the ‘terrorist’.

* Naumann was protecting the West as well as serving the East. It is not hard to imagine what the authorities in Bonn would have said if they had learned the East Germans had virtually conducted a man carrying a bomb to a crowded Bahnhof station. And that’s if it hadn’t detonated. It would have been practically an act of war if it had.

* Even if you take the absolutely worst interpretation of the entire incident, Naumann is guilty of manslaughter, justifiable homicide, excess of zeal, call it what you will. Murder it wasn’t.

Now I probably wouldn’t have given Martin Naumann a medal but nor would I have instituted a thirty-year multidisciplinary search for him. Having identified him, I wouldn’t have put him on trial, I wouldn’t have found him guilty, I wouldn’t have given him a ten-stretch. Nor will I be writing a letter of commendation to the BBC for reporting all this yesterday in tones of lip-smacking approval.

I will probably just reflect once again on the vicissitudes of victors’ justice of which there seems to be a lot right now. Well, to be honest all the time. We do love our heroes and villains even if it might involve a bit of rough justice along the way. But to end on a more cheerful note:

At eighty years of age, Herr Naumann probably won’t serve the full term.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Hats wrote:
The Israeli government's latest violation of the cease-fire agreement makes no mention of the misidentified Palestinian corpse, it is purely a decision to resume the war (as stated more than once), to the dismay of Ha'aretz, Israel's liberal /left-wing newspaper


I suspect that restarting is a popular decison, ie there are very few Israelis now who reckon that "peace with the Arabs" is going to be a viable option, so to be frank Trump's plan has much more of a realist appeal to many than the previous Bibi/Biden agreed phased approach.

That has been the problem since October 7, what was a posssible previous winning card in elections "peace with the Arabs" simply no longer holds.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Why, then, did the Israeli government accept the January 'ceasefire' in the first place? I understand there was some need to pay lip service to Trump's promise to bring peace to the Middle East and Ukraine on his first day in office (he didn't specify morning or afternoon) but if they both knew it would require the deal from the Great Dealmaker being torn up pretty well immediately, it seems a strange thing to do. Even by their joint standards.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

My feeling is that the ceasefire was agreed as the fate of the hostages was a significant factor politically.

Less so now, why?

The 42-day first phase saw Hamas release 33 Israeli women, children, civilian men over 50 and those deemed “humanitarian cases.”

Now would be phase two, 24 young men, 4 are soldiers some others were young men involved in security of the concert.

Phase three are hostages confirmed dead by Israel.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

There is a lesson (ignored by commentators?) here for future terrorist groups that if your general cause has wide support in the west, then capturing women and children is (in realist, not in moral terms) effective and will force negotiated concessions, capturing young men, much less effective.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Not though at the government-to-government level. Remember that woman US basketball-player arrested by the Russians? No special treatment. She might as well have been a journeyman journo hostage. Or a tourist even, Iran specialises in them.

But maybe arresting a whole coach tour of old biddies might get some concessions. Or inviting kiddies to visit Father Christmas 'at his home in the tundra', banging them up and exchanging them for a job lot of FSB spies. Just throwing out ideas, you understand.

Late Breaking News: Trump is talking to Hamas after a thirty year veto on 'negotiating with terrorists'. "In the end we had to ignore our scruples about terrorists and talk to him," said a Hamas spokesperson.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Canadians are refusing to go on holiday in America. Given Canada's geographical position, this is presenting problems. It's OK for French Canadians, they can go look up their roots in the Old Country. But a fortnight with a Blackpool landlady is going to be a bracing experience for the Anglos.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 130, 131, 132 ... 135, 136, 137  Next

Jump to:  
Page 131 of 137

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group