View previous topic :: View next topic |
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
I don't think you understand the word 'rational', Endless. It's not the same as 'true' and it's certainly not the same as 'believed by Mr Rocking'.
I've never heard a eugenicist arguing that it is a matter of 'self-preservation'. It is to improve the species. I daresay even a eugenicist has noticed that the human race has managed to preserve itself quite well without the benefit of eugenics.
With the exception of people who genuinely loath themselves, people who think eugenics policies are rational must assume that they (or their dearly beloved) would never fall below the bar. |
Actually I rather think eugenicists are the sort of people who would positively revel in castrating some dim cousin. And far more rational than those dimwits who quote the Bible. Now that is irrational.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DPCrisp

In: Bedfordshire
|
|
|
|
I was going to say...
'Ere,
if obesity is all down to carbs
and carbs are all down to processed grain
and Venus figurines (from the 25,000 year old ball park) accurately depict obese women,
then we have evidence of graniculture that must have been practised in the cities, all the way across Europe to Siberia, long before agriculture was farmed out to the countryside.
Bread, etc. are such hard work, it's no surprise that only a few posh people could afford it.
Is there any other way for Upper Palaeolithic European women to get fat?
Can someone check that the Venus figurines do not occur in the Middle East credited with inventing agriculture? I bet a map of all hundred-ish finds would be interesting.
...but on looking for a quote to tag this to, I found a bunch of disagreement. Did I miss something: do we have the key to obesity or not? Do we know what the Venus figurines are evidence of all the way across Europe to Siberia, long before agriculture was farmed out to the countryside?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Komorikid

In: Gold Coast, Australia
|
|
|
|
Can someone check that the Venus figurines do not occur in the Middle East credited with inventing agriculture? I bet a map of all hundred-ish finds would be interesting. |
Does Catal Huyuk qualify as the Middle East because they have been found there.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Perhaps we ought to concentrate momentarily on this idea that carb-ingestion was originally an upper-class thing. After all, they are highly addictive which is normally the cue for forbidding them to the populace.
This would imply that carbs were not originally cultivated (which they later were for both animal and human consumption) but found. My guess would be in the form of wild tubers....what are truffles and is their acquired taste/rarity value a holdover from earlier times?
Compare the feeding of chocolate to the Aztec high-ups.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
|
|
|
|
what are truffles and is their acquired taste/rarity value a holdover from earlier times? |
Aren't truffles found by pigs? Female pigs are preferred. The animal that's taboo (though I think dogs can be used as truffle-hunters). And Ishmael pointed out a connection between sow/cow and females.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DPCrisp

In: Bedfordshire
|
|
|
|
Does Catal Huyuk qualify as the Middle East because they have been found there. |
How far is it from the bit(s) credited with inventing agriculture?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ishmael

In: Toronto
|
|
|
|
Hatty wrote: | And Ishmael pointed out a connection between sow/cow and females. |
You're going to ruin my reputation with the ladies!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tatjana

In: exiled in Germany
|
|
|
|
How far is it from the bit(s) credited with inventing agriculture? |
Surprise, surprise.
It's just there! According to rather new findings in Arch, agriculture was invented in Anatolia first.
yooopeedoopi doodledeedum... _________________ -Gory at thasp, keener fortha karabd-
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
So now we know it wasn't Anatolia.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DPCrisp

In: Bedfordshire
|
|
|
|
How far is it from the bit(s) credited with inventing agriculture? |
It's just there! According to rather new findings in Arch, agriculture was invented in Anatolia first. |
But how close is "just there"? Anatolia is a big place.
The Arch findings can only show where farming was first farmed out into the countryside. Before that, it was developed in cities, which we can't expect to have left any traces.
How many Venus figurines are there in Turkey?
Is Çatal Höyük the point of contact, where the temperate, graniculture-practising, Venus-figurine-sculpting city-network met the conditions where large scale farming was possible or necessary?
Are the Turkish figurines too old to be correlated to Turkish agriculture?
I would expect the figurines not to be widespread in the places and times of the earliest rural agriculture.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
|
|
|
|
if obesity is all down to carbs ... and Venus figurines (from the 25,000 year old ball park) accurately depict obese women |
Obese or pregnant? The 'Willendorf Venus', c.20,000 years, from Austria is said to be a fertility figure and, looking at the figurine's enlarged belly, breasts and hips, it could hardly be otherwise.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DPCrisp

In: Bedfordshire
|
|
|
|
Well, given that the usual picture is of hunter-gatherers just about scraping a living, I think they should be assumed to be slim. Seems to me there is a big difference between a slim pregnant woman and an obese woman, pregnant or not. The Venus figurines I've seen look obese. (Maybe there are some of each?)
And I think they look life-life: not some caricature or exaggeration to denote some venerable features "super-humans" should have. Compare large ears denoting wisdom: someone had to live long enough for that to be noticed. Big heads can only denote (super)intelligence once the brain is recognised as the thinking organ.
I think the Venus figurines depict real obesity, which says a lot about the usual picture of hunter-gatherers.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
|
|
|
|
It's commonly claimed that obesity in some cultures, Africa particularly, denotes wealth and social standing and is therefore attractive. Our society which is incomparably wealthy overall by most standards has such an abhorrence of obesity that even young children are weight-conscious and in some instances develop into anorexics.
There was a programme about an eight year-old girl who had to be admitted to a clinic in order to prevent her dying from self-imposed starvation; it was clear that she was very bright and came from a well-off family. It was also clear that she understood calorie-counting and the effects of prolonged exercise (told you she was bright) but wasn't considered mature enough to be able to explain her self-destructive behaviour. Despite blaming the "bad fairy" or inner voices, the children are evidently self-aware; can't help wondering if they're avoiding disclosing family shortcomings out of loyalty.
Seeing girls -- it's usually girls -- putting themselves through such pain made me wonder if the idea of size has changed forever and we will become not so much health-conscious as fat-intolerant.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
we will become not so much health-conscious as fat-intolerant. |
I'm not sure who the 'we' is nor that learning to be fat-intolerant (for girls) is necessarily a bad thing. Men (in this society, I don't know about Africa or Titianite Italy) tend to refuse to have sex with fat women and women with whom men don't want to have sex tend to be unhappy (again in this society, other times and other places seem to provide convents and things for this purpose).
Eight-year-olds with anorexia might be the outlying signal that in affluent consumer societies the body really is a temple and must be cossetted with care. Perhaps women might return the favour by refusing to sleep with fat men. At the moment they all will so long as the fattie's got a bit of money or a clinical cummerbund or... well... the dirty mares will accept any excuse.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|