Lucy Letby (Politics)

[Mick Harper]

Though talking about people coming home with mystery stains on their clothes, one of the best examples of 'careful ignoral' is when contemplating one's significant other's fidelity.

The curious feature of the situation is that his/her being unfaithful is not necessarily a game-changer in itself, but knowing they actually are is. Every individual is aware of the fact that most people in our society are non-monogamous at some time or other in their monogamous relationships so it is not something that can be put into psychic deep freeze.

You'd just rather not know in your own specific application of the general statistic. Not that I, specifically, have had sufficient number of lengthy monogamous relationships to be an expert on the subject.

[Wile E. Coyote]

If Dr Ravi Jayaram had witnessed what he thought was a criminal act by Lucy Letby, (not raising the alarm) then subsequently memoed staff, that she did raise the alarm, he has arguably it appears in effect "washed the clothes"

This is arguably a criminal offence on his part. It is irrelevant that a police investigation was not going at the time of his memo. If the Doctor had reason to beleive, at the time of the memo, that a subsequent police investigation of Letby would take place, (and the evidence is that, he later encouraged the police to investigate), it is still potentially a serious criminal case, and aslo a legal case against the hospital.

Thirwell will need to address this, as the purpose of the enquiry is to stop future serial killers, (It presupposes Letbys guilt) and allowing doctors to provide cover for a serial killers actions cannot be right.

Dr Ravi Jayaram, has not commented on this latest memo so their might be a simple explanation for all this. Innocence until proven guilty has to be always assumed.