MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
War on Terrorism (Politics)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 170, 171, 172  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

We can be reasonably confident now that Iran will either win the war or emerge unchanged, if not unscathed, from it. But clearly the government hasn't.

* The ayatollahs very foolishly chose a continuity candidate with no credibility and promptly disappeared from sight. In the Supreme Leader's case, literally. We can anticipate they will be the big losers.

* The civilian central government of president + the majlis seems to have played little part in the war which, presumably, means not majorly featuring after the war. What has been going on at lower levels may be different but even solid warwork will, presumably, mean they'll still be at lower levels when the smoke clears.

* The regular armed forces have been ineffectual. The regular air force and navy were pretty much extinguished early on, the ground-to-air forces have had a success rate of one-to-two per ten thousand enemy sorties and the army will be a no-show unless there is a prolonged land campaign, which seems unlikely.

* Leaving the IRGC who have flourished as never before. They are unlikely to give up their monopolistic position, irrespective of their theoretical loyalties. Whoever does? So we must now consider what an Iran under the IRGC will be like...
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Peace has been declared!

This will be President Trump's eighth or ninth war (opinions are divided) he has brought to a successful conclusion. But there's a fly in the ointment. Ten flies actually, since the US has agreed to a ceasefire on the basis of 'Iran's ten-point plan' and they are all, shall we say, a bit iffy.

1. A fundamental commitment to non-aggression from the US.

OK, that seems fair enough.

2. A continuation of Iran's control over the Strait of Hormuz.

I suppose Trump can cobble together some arrangement since, as he has been pointing out, America doesn't use it much.

3. The acceptance of enrichment in Iran's nuclear programme.

A climbdown of epic proportions but, again, Trump will cobble something together that will save some of his face.

4. Removal of all primary sanctions.
5. Removal of all secondary sanctions.

God knows what these amount to but it will be a great relief--and a return to a Sword of Damocles situation, one would have to say.

6. End of all UN Security Council resolutions against Iran.
7. End of all Board of Governors' resolutions against Iran.

Might as well make it a clean sweep. (I assume 7 refers to the World Bank etc.)

8. Compensation payments to Iran.

Blimey, no need to rub it in. I wonder how much Israel is going to stump up.

9. The withdrawal of US combat forces from the region.

I think this refers to the US marines and the 82nd Airborne rather than the US bases in the Gulf.

10. Ceasefire on all fronts, including against the Islamic resistance in Lebanon.

Thank God Israel won't be at the talks.

If anything like this Iranian shopping list emerges as the basis for a permanent peace it will be the biggest surrender by the Americans since Saigon, 1975.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

All the peace plans are coming together....

The Board of Peace (Gaza) have given Hamas till the end of the week to state they accept the Board of Peace disarmament proposal.

US President Donald Trump is apparently hopeful that they can then move forward with his plan for ending the Gaza war.

Wiley is a bit less hopeful.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

All the peace plans are coming together... The Board of Peace (Gaza) have given Hamas till the end of the week to state they accept the Board of Peace disarmament proposal. US President Donald Trump is apparently hopeful that they can then move forward with his plan for ending the Gaza war. Wiley is a bit less hopeful.

With good reason. What does it matter whether Hamas does or does not accept the disarmament proposal since

(a) there in so such thing as Hamas, only 'people who belong to Hamas', any of whom can disagree with the proposal and who will keep their arms
(b) Hamas itself can re-arm the following week
(c) there are Hamas-type organisations in Gaza for whom Hamas does not speak who will remain armed and do things indistinguishable from an armed Hamas
(d) the Israelis can tell their Hamas double agents to do them if it really looks like peace is breaking out.

It only takes one man with 'an arm' to start the cycle off again.

As I say elsewhere, the key is to 'declare a ceasefire' and see what gives. And the only people who can make the proposal work is Hamas itself. They are the only people who know who the ultras are, where the arms are buried and the wherewithal to deal with them.

It worked (eventually) with the IRA.

People forget that terrorists (and mullahs and Marxists and etc etc) are people too. They want a life. The key is to strike when that moment comes which means keeping on giving them the opportunity. Arguing over process is always futile.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

If it is true that the Kremlin wants to take “currently unused” savings in private banks for “emergency repairs” of the oil facilities at the ports of Ust-Luga, Primorsk, and Novorossiysk, which are “begging for help.” then things are getting very bad indeed.

Valentina Matviyenko (the Chair of the Federation Council of Russia) said this isn’t confiscation but a “temporary redirection” and the depositors will be eventually repaid with interest.

Russian Patiots will see this as a useful way of supporting the war effort. In the decadent west this would cause a rush to withdraw savings causing the banks to collapse.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Wiley wrote:
If it is true that the Kremlin wants to take “currently unused” savings in private banks for “emergency repairs” of the oil facilities at the ports of Ust-Luga, Primorsk, and Novorossiysk, which are “begging for help.” then things are getting very bad indeed.

We discussed doing something similar by way of compulsory add-ons to PAYE during both world wars. But in the end it was found that voluntary purchase of emergency war bonds did the trick.

Valentina Matviyenko (the Chair of the Federation Council of Russia) said this isn’t confiscation but a “temporary redirection” and the depositors will be eventually repaid with interest.

HMG said something similar. And it was!

Russian Patiots will see this as a useful way of supporting the war effort. In the decadent west this would cause a rush to withdraw savings causing the banks to collapse.

I expect the Russkies will prevent this by fiat, but it's still a daft way to proceed. I suppose the Iranians will be in a similar boat when they discover nobody is going to rush in to pay for the 'emergency repairs of their oil facilities' (and everything else). Except it may be in our interests to help them along in order to keep oil prices down.

Sun Tzu in the Art of War wrote:
What you bomb today you may have to pay for tomorrow.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Things have taken a desperate turn for poor old Benjamin Netanyahu.

Israelis are '79% in favour of the war in Lebanon' according to polls. When asked their view of toning it down temporarily to help Trump's ceasefire, one said, "What are we, another star on the American flag?" When a dog starts accusing his own tail of presumption he can't expect Pedigree Chum for tea.

Talking of which, Netanyahu understands only too well the perils of upsetting his White House buddy, so he has to do something. Joining the Israeli doves won't get him re-elected. Once you add the 21% of Israeli voters who are Palestinian to the 79%, there's only him left.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

How d'ya fancy a truly insoluble world problem?

* I don't mean intractable ones, like the Palestinians. Everyone can see the light at the end of the tunnel however distant it might be. The problem will be solved as soon as the light goes out.

* I don't mean ones we won't solve, like global warming. Everyone can see the light at the end of the tunnel and it is the train coming towards us, we just choose not to solve it.

* I mean a problem like the Sahel, where the solution is worse than the problem. Specifically the insurgencies sprouting everywhere and getting worse everywhere. There are no tunnels there. Or everyone's in one.

I shall be talking about this from time to time. It is truly horrific.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I can start in Nigeria, far and away the most populous and richest country in the Sahel. It has an Al-Shabaab insurrection going from strength to strength in their northern, i.e. Sahelian, parts. The Nigerian government has not sought outside assistance in combating it.

The other day the Nigerian airforce bombed a marketplace killing untold numbers of locals but not, as far is known, any Al-Shabbabians. They said this was pilot error but when asked who the pilot had been sent out to bomb it was 'Al-Shabaab terrorists shaking down local shopkeepers.'

It is difficult to see how this might be accomplished from the air save by bombing the marketplace and hoping to catch a coupla shakedown artists in the act. This summates the central problem:

1. All the central governments of the Sahel are incredibly incompetent.
2. This leads to popular discontent.
3. This leads to the growth of insurgent movements.
4. Which cannot be dealt with because of (1).

But why now, why this kind of insurrection and why are they all growing seemingly unstoppably? And why is it now being asked by the locals: 'Which is worse, being governed by the government or by the insurrectionists?'
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

There's an interesting court case going on in France at the moment. Lafarge is France's biggest cement company with major plants in Syria (which was, you might recall, French territory not so long ago). The directors of LaFarge have been hauled up for 'financing terrorism'.

Their crime?

Lafarge's people in Syria during the Assad days paid protection money to local hoods, identified as 'being ISIS', to leave their plants alone. Which they did. It's not something I would care to adjudicate upon.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

But it's a whole lot weirder on the other side of the Channel.

1. HMG declares Palestine Action to be a terrorist organisation.
2. It's totally daft but the police have no alternative but to start knocking down old ladies' doors in dawn raids and carting them off to gaol for saying, "I don't think Palestine Action are terrorists. Do you, Ada?"
3. High Court declares Palestine Action is not a terrorist organisation.
4. Old ladies released from gaol.
5. Old ladies hit streets in jubilation.
6. Police cart them off to gaol again.
7. Old ladies point out Palestine Action is no longer a terrorist organisation.
8. Police point out it's under appeal.
9. 'Here's your pickaxe, there's your pile of granite. Get that zimmer frame moving.'
10 Starmer still in office.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

American news anchor: What do you say to credible reports you have broken the Lebanese ceasefire four hundred times in the first twenty-four hours?
Israeli spokesperson: That is a ceasefire by our standards.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The Israelis are highly vexed though. At the news of the ceasefire being officially agreed by the Israeli and Lebanese governments, a million Lebanese forced out of their homes to seek refuge north of the Litani (and, later, north of those refuges) have come surging back.

The Israelis had thought they had prevented this by blowing all the bridges (not a war crime because Hezbollah, lacking amphibious equipment, often uses these bridges). When make-do-and-mend is supplemented by a bit of civil engineering assistance from the Lebanese army, nothing could stop the human tide. Now the poor old Israelis will have to do it all over again. Let's hope they have good back channels with Hezbollah.

A ceasefire historian writes: this is one of those very rare ceasefires in which both combatants are raring to take the 'cease' out of ceasefire.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The Athletic wrote:
The Palestinian Football Association (PFA) has appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against FIFA’s decision not to sanction Israel over football clubs based in the West Bank.

They might have a word with them about their football clubs based in Israel vide Maccabi Tel Aviv, but that's for another day.

As detailed by The Athletic last month, FIFA opted not to take action against the Israel Football Association (IFA) following a complaint lodged by the PFA in 2024.

They've got a track record of being bitterly pro-Israel.

The world governing body determined no action should be taken against Israel or the clubs, citing the “unresolved and highly complex” legal status of the West Bank under “international law”.

Fair takes yer breath away. 'We're not saying yes, we're not saying no, we're saying it's too complicated.' It's the cutest way of saying 'no' I've seen in many a year.

The United Nations (UN) and the International Court of Justice have both determined that all Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, which is sought by Palestinians as part of a future state, violate international law — a claim which Israel rejects.

Seems rather uncomplicated to me.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The war on opium has almost been won in the west, folks are opting for synthetic lab produced drugs.

We can now safely let the Taliban, and the Columbians cartels get on with their evil trade. No more setting fire to poppy fields or targetting Venezuelan boats needed, we instead need to carpet bomb laboratories.

These labs are often situated in the massive producer nations like China and India. That surely wont stop us.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-68669244
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 170, 171, 172  Next

Jump to:  
Page 171 of 172

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group