| View previous topic :: View next topic |
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
| New York Times wrote: | Trump Cut a Billion-Dollar Mining Deal. His Sons Stand to Profit.
An agreement between the U.S. and Kazakhstan has given a group of American investors with ties to the president and the commerce secretary access to one of the world’s largest untapped reserves of tungsten. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
| Mick Harper wrote: | | Our hero sets about combining his two loves to create an e-car with all the same gizmos Elon Musk stuffs his cars with, only his Chinese-built jalopy costs $10,000 dollars a pop rather than the 50-80 K our American hero is asking for one of his. Will 100% tariffs save Tesla Inc? |
I have just watched a YouTube that claims Tesla is about to launch an e-car costing $12,000.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
When it comes to explaining why heatwaves play such havoc with railway transport, it is agreed it is mostly down to continuously-welded steel rails not being able to expand and contract. I have just heard the leading academic expert on this, qua British railways, say
| In hotter countries they may well lay their rails at a higher temperature but most hotter countries don't have the cold winters we do. |
His interlocutor, a senior ex-railway executive turned YouTube host, did not demur from this. Britain, in fact, has probably the lowest annual range of temperatures of any of the major railway nations. If two of our more notable experts don't know this, I fear the havoc will continue for sometime yet.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
They had a rundown of the thirty-two London boroughs the other day -- you know the sort of thing, ranking them from worst to first. I didn't want to sit through it all because they always start at the bottom and work upwards so it would have taken an hour or more to find out whether it was Lewisham/one, Kensington/two or Kensington/one, Lewisham/two. It's always a fine judgement.
But I take a ghoulish pleasure in finding out who's the present pits so I sat through five minutes on the iniquities of (32) Barking & Dagenham and (31) Croydon. Then came (30) Lewisham so I moved on to something with a bit of objectivity attached.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
At this perilous juncture in our island story, the nation's senior voice, Newsnight, is investigating the Prince and the Pizza once more. After reminding us of the charge--that a sailor had it off with a young woman he had met at a party--our Moral Guardian informed us they hadn't managed to uncover any new evidence, but somehow that was significant.
We turned to one another in our parlours, tapping the side of the nose with the first finger of the right hand. "There's no smoke without fire."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
CNN ran their equivalent, a Maine Democrat -- who might represent the swing vote in the Senate after November. The dude had won the nomination despite all manner of dubious activities coming to light.
'We're sticking with him because he's better than Trump,' being the general sentiment as he received endorsement after endorsement from Democrat heavyweights. Until this week, when a woman came forward with an accusation of rape from five years ago.
| "I had to sleep with him because he was so drunk I didn't want to send him home in his car, putting other road-users at risk." |
Such public-spiritedness should earn her the nomination in his place.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
I sympathise with Prince Harry. I remember having to make a last minute trip to London with the wife and kids and phoning mum to see if she could put us up for a coupla days. 'Sorry, pet, we've got a houseful at the moment, you should have rung.'
'Who's in my old room?' I asked.
'We haven't finished fumigating it,' she replied jokingly.
At least I think she was joking.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Would you like a well-paid job in charge of several thousand dedicated employees and which gives you an unexcelled degree of personal power over several million of your fellow citizens? No, probably not. But you do know zillions who would give their eye-teeths just for a week behind that particular desk. Well, tell 'em they can get a five-year gig, no sweat.
That's because an average of three people apply for every vacant Chief Constable's job. If that's too much competition, a lot of them have only one applicant so they'll have a 50/50 shot at those. And don't worry about not being on the in-house grapevine, the position has to be widely advertised by law.
So how have we been reduced to such a parlous state when it comes to appointments that carry such moment? As you probably guessed by that 'one applicant', everyone knows who's going to get the job, and if not, it will be someone remarkably like the last one. And that's not like anyone you know. It's not like any senior policeman with a bit of gumption either.
It's not quite Buggin's Turn but it's certainly Grandmother's Footsteps. The lucky candidate is always a box-ticking, admin-type who's been on all the courses but hasn't done anything for real apart from making his immediate superior's life easier. Like Jack Frost's nemesis, Horn-Rimmed Harry, but without the charisma. /more
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
It's true the police are not very important in an orderly place like Britain but even so it's worth not leaving them entirely to their own devices. I know you can level this accusation at all the other flabby bureaucracies that run the show -- the civil service, local authorities, the universities, the BBC, the NHS, blahdiblah -- but we've got to start somewhere.
For a start, why should it be a policeman? It used not to be. Chief Constables could be retired military men or local magnates. It might be a good idea if they were not allowed to be policemen. CEO's of conglomerates haven't normally worked their way up from the post room. That way. Chief Constables might be CEO's rather than figureheads, good at PR and keeping things the way they are.
People of that sort would at least be capable of withstanding the sort of pettifogging complaints about them doing something perfectly normal but which has broken some rule or other and forced their resignation. Or worse, taking responsibility for some enormity committed by individuals about twelve ranks beneath their own.
They would certainly do something about the whole operation being gradually turned into an arm of social services despite being institutionally racist, sexist, homophobic and the rest. We need an anti-policeman to police the police.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Oh no! The council house is back. Andy Burnham's all for them apparently. Channel 4 News took a loquacious Labour housing acolyte on a tour of a vast south London development. All these will be given to the council, she said proudly, pointing at one block. These will be affordable for first-time buyers, she said pointing at another block. And the rest will be for commercial sale so it won't have cost a penny of public money.
I couldn't see the difference personally. But I could see millions of pounds going up in smoke. Let me roll the picture on ten years:
1. Some of the council flats will have been sold for an enormous profit by the people lucky enough to be awarded one and who have lived there for the two years required to avail themselves of the 'right to buy'.
2. Some of them will be illegally rented out to City folk for a vast profit by the people lucky enough to be awarded one.
3. Some of them will be occupied by 'problem families'. Not many but enough to put a permanent blight on the whole estate.
4. The first-time buyers will have pocketed the difference between an affordable and a non-affordable flat and moved on.
5. Everyone else will be owner-occupiers like most of the rest of the country only, this being London, they are already paper millionaires.
Welcome to the big city, Andy, there's a reason no-one's built a council house for the last twenty years. /more
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|