MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The Importance of Sport (NEW CONCEPTS)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 348, 349, 350 ... 356, 357, 358  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Grant



View user's profile
Reply with quote

Watched the Champions League final after discovering I had HBO through Sky (who knew?).

Sad they lost but not really. I can see what you meant by the "hoofing" comments. I get that they had to play defensively but why, when they had the ball, were they so keen to boot it away? They surely didn't teach Arteta to do that at the Barcelona academy.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I wasn't sad they lost, more 'unmoved'. It seemed to me to be a just result i.e. they were the team playing the better football but we gave a good account of ourselves.

The hoofing is clearly under managerial instruction but it is weird because when we were obliged not to, i.e. before we scored and after they had, we showed we could play quite good football, even if it was marginally less good than theirs.

That would be an unbeatable model for the future: an amazingly obdurate defence and a midfield and attack marginally less good than the best team in the world. It's just if Arteta hasn't worked that out yet, I can't see him working it out at all.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I had HBO through Sky

Are you sure it wasn't Amazon? UEFA had sold the rights for one match on every Euro-match night, them having first choice when it came to which one. That match was often Arsenal's, to my immense fury. I was worried about which match they might choose when it came to Final night but, it seems, they munificently agreed to share it with TNT.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Cocklecarrot's Cup

The penalty won by PSG that ultimately delivered them victory was not seriously questioned by either side, by VAR or by the commentariat. It was by me. Ally McCoist had it right

'The PSG man was very clever putting his body between Mosquera and the ball'

and he should know. But is that what it takes to win the biggest trophy in European football? Being the artful dodger?

Mosquera was running on the goalside and alongside--but a smidgeon behind--the PSG left winger, a perfectly legitimate thing to do. Indeed his bounden duty as a right back to do. The wiley foreigner pushed the ball on a coupla yards then deliberately altered his course into the path of the Arsenal man. Mosquera couldn't have stopped in time even if he'd been wearing Ferodo shinpads so unavoidably and inevitably clattered into the bloke.

Not that the laws of the game required our man to stop at all. He's perfectly entitled to run in any direction he likes. If opponents choose to get in his way, that's their lookout. They might get clattered, they might get a yellow card for obstruction but they are definitely not entitled to a pen in any footballing universe I approve of.
Send private message
Grant



View user's profile
Reply with quote

HBO Max carries TNT Sports live coverage, and I've got HBO on my Sky subscription. Sky says it's free but I'm sure I pay for it somehow. Apparently it's all part of the Warner Bros Discovery ecosystem.

Modern telly is very complicated.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Which package had the one showing Arsenal winning the shoot-out?
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

It occurs to me AI could do this quite easily. It only requires the alteration of a few frames. You might opt for this kind of service or the National Health AI might decide you require it in your condition.

But hope is at hand. My package requires me take Sky Movies if I want TNT Sport and Netflix is thrown in free save for a coupla minutes of ads per film. Those ads are carefully targeted by their AI doodad. I get sanitary pads or top o' the line electric cars over and over.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Suddenly everyone's got a new manager. Liverpool's nabbed their statutory Basque from Bournemouth, Chelsea have got top o' the line Xabi Alonso, City have got supposedly top o' the line Enzo Maresca and United have kept faith with surprise success Michael Carrick. Since we're dealing with the traditional Top Six, Spurs have got new/old wunderkind Roberto De Zerbi.

So where does that leave grizzled veteran been-there-forever Mikel Arteta? Has he got an open goal while his rivals get their feet under the table? Maybe not. It looks like his old rivals were a combination of over-the-hill's and Rolls Canardlies. Is he already a stale one-shot wonder? We must hope not.

One thing does worry me though. You never hear about other clubs 'making enquiries about Arteta', do you? Unless that's a good sign. Oh well, you never know, it may all be down to the players. There's a thought.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Real Madrid are just about to get Konate from Liverpool on a free. Just like they got Trent-Alexander (virtually) free last year. They got Rudiger the same way. Not just defenders either. They got Mbappe for nothing and he was the most expensive footballer in the world! But how do they do it?

It's simple -- if illegal. They have a word with the agent. 'If you let your player run down his contract, we'll pay him top o' the line and here's something for your trouble.'

But why the agent? Why not the player? Well, for a start, footballers blab. Agents don't. Not if they've been back-handered. But it has to be the agent because agents never want their clients to run down their contract.

If they do, the little lamb can go anywhere and it'll either be somewhere he wants to go or whoever offers the most money. There's no transfer fee and there's no 'commission' for the bloke who was in the middle of the frenzy to sign him.

The fact that it is always in the player's interest to run down his contract because there is no transfer fee and therefore what he'll get in wages will reflect that. In other words he gets the transfer fee, not his club.

But why is it only Real Madrid that has hit on this device as a policy? Possibly because they can hide their dealings in and out better than most clubs. They are somewhat privileged in that way. Maybe they're just the most crooked but least afraid of anybody doing anything about it. Or perhaps it is the prospect of playing for Real Madrid that's important.

I'm not entirely sure.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Josh Tongue was back in the England team at Lords yesterday, bowling against the New Zealanders. At one point, the commentator said, "Yes, Tongue's been in the groove, all right." I couldn't tell whether this was deliberate or not. You can deadpan the life out of a joke.

PS It was typical that the test season kicked off in the week after British temperatures had broken all records. They had an early lunch because of rain and finally went off for bad light.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

"Now that forty million seems to be the going rate for a squad player." YouTube bloke

This would mean the top Premier teams must have a billion pounds worth of livestock on hand which doesn't seem to be a viable business model. But I suppose it comes down when you take resales into account. Perhaps it's better to look at things in a 'value-added' sort of way.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Lord's is the 'home of cricket'. It is the most important cricketing venue in the world. Its most important task is to prepare twenty-two yards of grass upon which a bouncing cricket ball travelling at c 80 mph doesn't either rear up and hit a batsman in the throat or scuttle along the ground and hit his middle-and-off depending whether it pitches in one place or the same place a ball later.

Even I would get 5-37 with my dobbers and my name on the honours board. Unless it's all the bad weather we've been having lately. That can affect pitch preparation. Not where you are--it's been great weather--where they are. It may be what we microclimatologists call a 'microclimate'.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Playing the same country at both cricket and football on the same day, as we did yesterday against New Zealand at Lord's and Tampa respectively is unusual. I venture to say, unique. But for an interestingly AE reason. No country in the world, except England, plays both cricket and football as their major summer and winter game respectively.

And talking of microclimates, I spent all day trying to judge whether I could slip out to do my weekly shop between showers, so I wasn't surprised they didn't get much play in at Lord's.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Why There's A Goal Drought From Open Play

There's only two good ways of beating modern defences and that is by either dribbling your way through or intricately passing your way through. It only takes once or twice in a game to win that game.

Both these skills are on show in other parts of the pitch but, it seems, there are too many foreign bodies in the area to allow it in front of goal. One could urge them to practise it on the training ground but they would be up against defences practising how to prevent it on the training ground.

But it wouldn't be necessary if goals could be scored from outside the box. If they could, defences would have to move up to stop them, thereby creating enough space inside the box for dribbly wall-passing.

Betya don't know the reason why long-range shots are not statistically worthwhile.

It's because the goal is too small. When they were designed (to be eight yards by eight feet), the height of the average British adult male was five foot five inches. It's five foot nine inches now. The modern goalie is too big for his goal.

Betya do know the chances they'll change the size of the goal.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

They should test it out in the Isthmian League or somesuch. But they won't because I (and now you) are the only people who know.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 348, 349, 350 ... 356, 357, 358  Next

Jump to:  
Page 349 of 358

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group