View previous topic :: View next topic |
Wile E. Coyote
In: Arizona
|
|
|
|
Wiley disagrees, this allows the defending team to reorganise. The more dangerouus throw-in is the one where the ballboy immediately flips a ball to the onrushing thrower, who then quickly takes the throw before the defence is ready.
Only works for home teams.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Arsenal are still the only team that remembers you can't be offside from a throw-in and parks someone on the goal line. This is exceptionally weird (of the other teams).
Don Revie (I think it was) realised that for the defending side having a throw near their own goal line was exceptionally hazardous and Billy Bremner (or whoever it was) had a magic word that he shouted and everyone handy in all-white would rush to that quadrant of the pitch, led by Norman Hunter who would 'bite the legs' of any defender with thoughts of clearing the ball. 'Farmer' Giles and 'Sniffer' Clarke did the rest.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Grant

|
|
|
|
Rory Delap, the best ever throw-in taker, was a good javelin thrower at school. Maybe that combination - strong upper body strength plus twinkle toes with the feet - doesn't come together very often.
Although some PL footballers look like they should be able to pull off both accomplishments. Adama Traore, for instance, looks like he'd make a fine spear chucker (!) and is certainly good with his feet.
I think it comes down to modern managers not wanting to be embarrassed by relying on long-ball football. It requires an AE specialist like Tony Pulis to say to hell with tiki taka.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Pete Jones

In: Virginia
|
|
|
|
Is there an equivalent for the following in sarker?
When a basketball team intentionally fouls a player (because he is a poor free throw shooter, they call it "Hacka-[insert player name]". This almost never works as a phrase yet they do it anyway. It comes from the fact that the human mountain Shaquille O'Neal ("Shaq") was a bad free throw shooter, and teams would "Hacka-Shaq."
Being completely uncreative, Reggie Miller the announcer just said, in seriousness, "Hacka-Mitchell-Robinson." Just drop it, at that point.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Grant: You put an exclamation after 'spear chucker', so I assume you are referring to the black quarterback ringer in M*A*S*H. Reminding us that every kid in America can throw a ball a certain way, but can't bowl a ball for toffee.
A correspondent writes when I was checking with him about the originator of the long throw: 'I remember Ian Hutchinson as a Chelsea name from long ago but hadn't remembered he was a long throw specialist.'
Pete: If the person fouled had to take the penalty we might get less diving in the box. Or more. The only time someone gets shaqued is when the manager glares at you before a penalty shoot-out.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Another twat sounding off from the terraces
--------------
Notes from Midweek Mar 16, 2024
Everything’s getting fractured. Nobody knows
where they are with the schedules.
I was watching our boys dispose of euro-fodder (Porto after pens, for your records) when the bloke on the telly said, “That wraps it up for Arsenal for three weeks until they play Manchester City in the big one. They’ll be well-rested.”
Three weeks? Three weeks! You’re pulling my pisser. |
I’ve heard of a winter break, I’ve heard of a summer break, but I’ve never heard of a spring break. As most of you are ‘Arsenal-till-I-die’ I’d better investigate while I’m still alive.
First week, it’s the FA Cup and we ducked out of that to concentrate on the league so, fair enough, that means a trip to Doha.
Second week is an ‘international week’. All right, I understand there are minor places to be filled by minor countries to fill out the group stages for the Euros, but what’s it got to do with us? We qualified as top seeds several monarchs and/or prime ministers ago.
Why are we having to put the Premiership on ice? |
Apparently, say the powers-that-be, it’s liberté, égalité, fraternité, one plé/all plé, so we’re down for friendlies against Brazil and Belgium.
They were one and two in the world rankings last time I looked. Why are we volunteering for serial duffings at Wembley? We fill the place if it’s Gibraltar so it can’t be for the bums on seats, and we’re not up for a tournament staging so it can’t be for the bums in Zurich. The reasons I’ve seen are suspiciously multiplex:
(1) The England players need match practice together. What, against teams the like of which we won’t be facing until the quarters at the earliest? It makes more sense playing against also-rans. That way we can use the three group matches against nobodies to prepare for games against somebodies.
(2) It’s to give Gareth a coupla opportunities to test out his new 3–2–3–1–1 system (or whatever he’s dreamt up because Harry refuses to play up front). Anyone who thinks two different sets of players (you bet it will be) playing friendlies is suitable preparation for a third set of players (you bet it will be) playing for real, doesn’t understand modern football. I’m not saying I do, but I do understand applied epistemology.
(3) It’s to sort out the squad. This is absolutely and totally wrong. X plays well, he’s in. Y doesn’t, he’s out. One time, in a nothing match, in March, at home, in a scratch team, against a mega team, with people being substituted wholesale if they haven’t been subbed beforehand by their club manager because of a mystery groin strain. I’d rather use a ouija board. S... A... K... A
Let me remind Gareth the only ad hoc team that never did any preparation for the Euros was Denmark who, having failed to qualify, were sunning themselves on beaches in places sunnier than Denmark. They got the call when Yugoslavia fell apart and couldn’t make it to the tournament, so Danske odds-and-sods were rounded up from all over, bundled on chartered Fokker biplanes and delivered, post haste, to the tournament where they played, faute de mieux, in a 1–1–1–1–1–1–1–1–1–1 formation. And beat the bollocks off everyone.
Gareth, what in your experience is the number one problem facing all players at the end of a sixty-game season? Correct. Knackered is as knackered does. Wouldn’t it have been better to let them put their feet up back in March dreaming of England, not having to turn out for England? So think for England. Just for a change.
As it is, we’ve now got no choice but to win it by being better than everyone else. It’s lucky for you, Mr Southgate Sah! that, as it happens, we are currently better than everyone else. Not that that will make a blind bit of difference. When it comes to the real thing, it’s always the ouija board, and you’ve got an applied epistemologist’s word for that. I’m putting some forms in the post.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Stat of the Week
If they can become just the seventh side this century to overturn a first-leg Champions League semi-final deficit, they’d be one game from one of the greatest seasons in their history. The Guardian |
There have only been forty-eight Champions League semifinals this century and a good many of them must have resulted in first leg away wins or been drawn, so if it's already been done six times, I hardly think 'just' is the mot juste. We should piss it on this form.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Pete Jones

In: Virginia
|
|
|
|
Stat of the Week
The $6B Boston Celtics took 60 three pointers last night, missing 45 of them - a record for misses. They barely lost the game to the New York Trousers. In the 3rd quarter, they took a total of 20 shots, 19 of which were 3-pt attempts. As a result, the befuddlement of NBA media is running high, acting like this is why they lost the game. Is there an AE principle about the illogic of judging decisions only by their results?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Are you being serious? It is a prime directive. However, there is the wider point of whether according to 'the metrics' it is ever worth taking a three-point shot. But presumably this is a well-worn path in a sport and a country obsessed with analytics. (You might ponder why you are the only such country, that is an AE question.)
Slightly more interesting is the coincidence of scoring forty-five points while missing forty-five shots.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Pete Jones

In: Virginia
|
|
|
|
My initial response to the "why we're the only country" question is, Is that even true? Then I assumed it was true and thought, "Everything is treated as business, even games - and here more than anywhere." Then I thought, Is that even true?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Wile E. Coyote
In: Arizona
|
|
|
|
The whole idea that you should get more points for the extra difficulty of scoring at long range seems really weird to us, but I guess we need to try it for a season by awarding 2 goals for shots outside the penalty area. But then a free kick outside the box might be worth a possible 2 if converted, a penalty a maximum 1. So it doesnt feel right.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Pete Jones

In: Virginia
|
|
|
|
Wile E. Coyote wrote: | seems really weird to us |
Us? So you're not an Arizonker?
There are discussions, in seriousness, about a 4-pt line in the NBA. Infinite regress inbound. I admit that it is exceedingly difficult to throw a 12-inch diameter ball into a 20-inch diameter ring, especially from 23.75 feet away, so I'm fine with the point increment.
But there's a hitch that has been exploited to the confusion of all clear-thinking people: if you're in the corner of the basketball court, the 3-pt line is only 22 feet away, which makes it incrementally easier. This shot can be made by your just-above-run-of-the-mill 7-foot player.
To rationalize this and end the infinite regress. Make it 4 points from 24.5 feet, and 3 points from 22 feet.
When another Steph Curry comes along and teaches everyone to shoot from 28 feet and ruins it all again, I propose we install industrial fans that blow across the court randomly.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Steph Curry comes along and teaches everyone to shoot from 28 feet |
This is called '1912 Stockholm Syndrome'. Any reasonable club runner of today would have won the 100 metre gold medal then. Even when you factor in better training methods this is inexplicable because there has not been time for evolution to change the human body.
If you posit a 'Steph Curry factor' you then have to explain why nobody today would be able to fit into a medieval suit of armour yet height is meant to be genetically determined and, agan, there hasn't been time for survival of the fittest to work its magic. Especially as armour wearers are already the 'fittest'.
This is subjected to careful ignoral if you ask a neo-Darwinist.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Back to my favourite subject, hanky panky in the beautiful game.
-----------------
Footballer rewrites Dostoevsky March 30, 2024
Let’s say there’s this burglar in Paris and eventually les flics arrest him and he gets a year in the can. He moves to London, continues his evil ways and gets caught for this fresh set of downs. He finds himself up in front of the beak once more only this time he’s brought along a brief who has a whole new slant on crime and punishment.
Newcastle United’s manager, Eddie Howe, believes Sandro Tonali has been punished sufficiently for his breaches of betting regulations and believes the FA won’t punish him for the new fifty betting breaches he has admitted to, some of which involved wagers on Newcastle matches.
The 23-year-old Italian midfielder received a 10-month suspension from Italian authorities in October for illegal betting activities during his time at AC Milan, rendering him ineligible to play until late August 2024. “I’ll be hugely disappointed if the ban’s extended,” said Howe. |
Dear Eddie
When you’ve signed someone for seventy million, didn’t do your due diligence and discovered, when he arrived, he couldn’t play for you all season because of a betting ban, is it fair and reasonable you should have to lose him for another season just because you weren’t diligent enough to stop his illicit gambling?
He’s got to do something while sitting in the stands at St James’s, hasn’t he? I’m with you a hundred and ten per cent.
With Sandro out for a further season, possibly more as a recidivist, then having to get him back to match fitness, re-integrating him into the team and so forth, you’ll have lost a good chunk of that seventy mil you shelled out for what, a four-year contract? And it’ll be literally chump-change if you decide to move him on.
What’s worse is it still counts when they reckon up Newcastle’s Fair Play spending for last season, this season and next season. You’ll be down all that dosh with nothing to show for it — can’t play him, not allowed to replace him.
It’s looking very much like a rolling three-year downward spiral for you and your Geordies, I’m afraid. My heart goes out to all of you. And it gets worse…
It’s the Saudi Arabian Sovereign Fund that’ll be sucking on it. It gets better and better.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Wile E. Coyote
In: Arizona
|
|
|
|
In the good old days, punishments were real. Tony Kay Sheffield Wednesday, Everton and English international, got 7 weeks in jail, and a life ban. The only small consolation was that he had been awarded "man of the match", by the Sunday Record, despite contriving with others to throw the game Ipswich Town v Sheffield Wednesday match in the 1962–63 season.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|