MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Do We Live On A Pythagorean World? (Megalithic)
Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Wireloop


In: Detroit
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The tilt of the earth is 23.4 degrees. Which means that the the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn and the Arctic/Antarctic Circles are at 23.4 and 66.6 degrees respectively. To me and perhaps to an early Pythagorean this becomes an interesting observation because it turns the Earth into a rather 'metaphysical' object!

The distance between the Tropic of Capricorn and the Tropic of Cancer is 23.4 degrees + 23.4 degrees = 46.8 degrees
The distance between the Tropic of Cancer and the Arctic Circle is 66.6 - 23.4 = 43.2
The ratio of these distances (46.8 / 43.2) = 1.083333

Not very signficant you're thinking. But a Pythagorean would immediately recognise it as being the ratio between 13 and 12. Why would he do so? Because 12:13 ratio is a primitive Pythagorean triplet, i.e., 5:12:13. (a-SQUARED) + (b-SQUARED) = c-SQUARED [You will remember it from your schooldays as the 5,12,13 right-angled triangle that goes alongside the 3,4,5 right-angled triangle.]

But, as it happens, 12 and 13 has another "world significance".



Let's go around the earth counterclockwise in eight steps.

Tropic of Capricorn (across equator) to Tropic of Cancer = 13
Tropic of Cancer to Arctic Circle = 12
Arctic Circle (across north pole) to Arctic Circle = 13
Arctic Circle to Tropic of Cancer = 12
Tropic of Cancer (across equator) to Tropic of Capricorn = 13
Tropic of Capricorn to Antarctic Circle = 12
Antarctic Circle (across south pole) to Antarctic Circle = 13
Antarctic Circle to Tropic of Capricorn = 12

CIRCLE COMPLETE in 100 segments.
13+12+13+12+13+12+13+12 = 100
Hmmm.
Send private message
Wireloop


In: Detroit
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The hypotenuse of Stonehenge's 'station stones', in pointing to the crossquarter rising sun points ESE directly to Giza.







Send private message
Wireloop


In: Detroit
View user's profile
Reply with quote

So the questions are:
Did the Ancients who put the station stones in place at Stonehenge,
1) Know the 'tropics' and the 23.4 degree tilt of the earth?
2) Know the 'Pythagorean' theorem?
3) Know about Giza?

The scholars tell us that the station stones were put in place around 2000 BC. This is in close proximity to the time that the pyramids were built. Keep in mind that the 3,4,5 triangle is the most primitive Pythagorean triplet. The 5:12:13 triangle is the second most primitive triangle, but the 3,4 5 progression represents amongst other things; 3-triangle, 4-square, 5-pentagon.

What is not known to many people is the discovery in Britain of the 'early Platonic solids' (a manifestation of the 3:4:5 progression). They're currently housed at the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford.

Send private message
Wireloop


In: Detroit
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Perhaps the most significant thing about Stonehenge is the placement of the 'station stones' in a 5:12:13 pythagorean triplet. Except that now there is a an elephant in the room that nobody seems ever to notice -- the station stones were placed into the pre-existing Aubrey Circle.

Using parallax observation, the station stones point precisely to Giza. But what exactly is parallax observation? Simply put, it is the apparent shift of an object against a background due to a change in the observer's position. Imagine that you are standing twenty feet directly behind a huge stone that is fourteen feet high and seven 14 foot across. Now take a step to the left and all of a sudden you can now see another fourteen-foot stoner a hundred yards in front of your stone.

Now take another half-step to the left and you see a separation between the stone directly in front of you and the stone a hundred yards away. That's parallax. The tiny gap between stones is only a sliver of light but it gives you clear view of the south-east horizon. More than that, it just happens to point precisely to Giza (cutting through Pharos) and the November 5th (crossquarter) sunrise. I mean precisely...well, according to Google Earth.

Send private message
Wireloop


In: Detroit
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Look at the following picture plotted with the east/west line of latitude. The 56 Aubrey Holes (in blue) were supposedly dug around 2500 BC, whilst the 4 'station stones' (in red) were installed later (around 2000 BC).

Why were the 4 additional 'station stones' in a 5:12:13 ratio installed in the same perimeter as the Aubrey Holes?
What is 56 + 4 ?
What do you think of when you see a circle of 60?
Count the 'dots' in between the lines.
Grab a protrator.

Send private message
Ishmael


In: Toronto
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Wireloop,

This Giza-connecting line, is it the same line that forms the right triangle with the Quarry site and that offshore island?
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Ishmael's point reminds me to wonder which is, as it were, the datum line. The starting point for all this, and especially to what extent the site of Stonehenge was chosen, to what extent it was dictated by other factors. I have read somewhere that a latitude in the low fifties is particularly useful for making various observations though for the life of me I can't remember what these are.

But, by a curiosity of geography, finding somewhere that is both accessible and in the low fifties lattitude is actually quite difficult. Have a look at a map of the Old World and you will see that southern England is one of the very few places where this latitude coincides with ready access to the sea, and is certainly the first accessible piece of substantial real estate when coming from the Mediterranean.

I have pointed out elsewhere that Salisbury "Plain" is somewhat unique in Britain (any other 'plains' about?) and might therefore be considered a good candidate for an artificially levelled surface.
Send private message
Wireloop


In: Detroit
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Stonehenge is located at 51.17 degrees latitude. Below is a close-up of Stonehenge's Sarsen circle and the two most southerly station stones. Two of the station stones are no longer present, but the experts tell us, through analysis of the ground, where they were most likely located. I have marked one of these station stones in red.

Now, considering my previous post about parallax observation and Giza, it is quite likely that all of the station stones 'point' to something via parallax observation. But what?

I draw a precise North-South line.

Now notice the exact line of sight of the two station stones in conjunction with one of the Sarsen stones. Not only are these three stones pinpointing which way to look, but the station stones' line of sight is an exact tangent to the Sarsen circle. BIG FLAG.
It just so happens that the line of sight intersects the North-South line at a 51.17 degree angle, the same latitude as Stonehenge!

So it would appear that these guys were not only 'mapping' their location, they knew, from our previous example of the hypotenuse, the exact location of Giza over 2000 miles away.

So, where do you think that this line of sight points to?

Hint:
All parallax observation from the station stones thus far have been toward the middle of the sarsen circle ie an observer behind a station stone never steps away from the circle to get a view of another stone, he steps toward the circle to view the stone behind it. Think about the earth's 'zones'.


Send private message
admin
Librarian


View user's profile
Reply with quote

Due to the number and complexity of the pix in this thread, some people might be having technical problems. If you find that your width is insufficient (ie you have to scroll across to read each line) then you can normally solve this by clicking the square in the top right hand corner to make your image whole page. Alternatively you can shift the entire page sideways so that the left-hand side-bar is not shown. If this still doesn't do it for you, let me know -- we can scale down the images. Also let me know if any of the pix come out with parts obscured.
Send private message
Wireloop


In: Detroit
View user's profile
Reply with quote

So, plotting the 51.17 degree 'line of sight' from Stonehenge's station stones, around the earth, we find that the line of sight intersects the equator at the same longitude as Giza.

The Great Pyramid sits at 31.130 degree longitude, whilst Stonehenge's line of sight intersection with the equator sits at 31.078 degrees longitude. That is only 1/20th of a degree difference in longitude over the course of 5000 miles. Incredible! So now we have two precise 'pointers' to Giza from Stonehenge's station stones.

Now check this out. The line of sight from Stonehenge to the equator has created another 13:12 triangle with only a 0.019 difference over the course of 2300 miles!



Now, where does the line go after the equator? Any guesses?
Send private message
DPCrisp


In: Bedfordshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Now, where does the line go after the equator? Any guesses?

Lake Victoria, "source" of the Nile?
Send private message
Wireloop


In: Detroit
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Lake Victoria, "source" of the Nile?

Yea, there too, but we've got bigger fish to fry.
Keep in mind that this whole observation started (in the first post) by investigating the tilt of the earth in respect to the 13:12 ratio.
23.4 + 23.4 = 46.8
66.6 - 23.4 = 43.2

46.8:43.2 = 1.083

13:12 = 1.083
Send private message
Ishmael


In: Toronto
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Looks like it might approach Easter Island.
Send private message
DPCrisp


In: Bedfordshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Tropic of Capricorn at 90° East?
Send private message
Wireloop


In: Detroit
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Following Stonehenge's 'line of sight' past the equator we find that it 'skims' the Antarctic Circle and heads back home. The line of sight is precisely defining THE TILT OF THE EARTH in respect to Giza and Stonehenge. On its way back home, and because of its nature, it also skims the Arctic Circle.

It seems that the alignment of the station stones in the 13:12 ratio IS defining the tilt of the earth.

But wait there is more! Where exactly does it 'skim' the Antarctic Circle? Zooming in you will notice that the line's closest point of contact is: Latitude 66.404, Longitude 121.05. Google Earth has defined the Antarctic Circle as 66.55 degrees latitude. So apparently the Stonehenge dudes were only 0.146 degrees (assuming Google Earth is the correct one!). That is only 1/7th of a degree (10 miles) away from absolute precision, HALF WAY AROUND THE WORLD.

...er... there is more.

Look closely at the longitude of intersection: 121.05 degrees.

Remember the Great Pyramid is located at 31.13 degrees?
121.05 - 31.13 = 89.92 degrees and 90.00 - 89.92 = 0.08 degrees. The point of intersection with the Antarctic Circle is only 0.08 degrees (1/12th of a degree, a mere 6 miles) away from a perfect right angle.

Or said another way, if the Stonehenge/Antarctic point of intersection was moved directly north to the latitude of the Great Pyramid, then the distance between it and the Pyramid would be exactly 1/4 of the circumference of the earth.

Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

Jump to:  
Page 1 of 3

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group