MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The Importance of Sport (NEW CONCEPTS)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 164, 165, 166 ... 260, 261, 262  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

"politics" or "rules" will have little to do with it

That's the best bogus list I've seen all day.

broadly the TV audience will be in favour as the Olympics is now watched more by a more female "reality show" type audience

I appreciate that such an audience likes novelty and a freak show but do women specifically favour transgenders and more especially 'them' taking 'our' medals. I watched as an odd-looking cove qualified in a women's 100 metre heat. It was noticeable that after the race the runners, generally a gregarious crowd, cold-shouldered their new addition. Not that women have much of a say in these top level decisions.

who are not concerned with the rules or results, in the way that some males are

Bogus lists numbers two and three.
Given that it is American TV that calls the shots

Some. Some of the time.
the BBC will follow behind

Some. Some of the time.
Transgenderism will become accepted in these sports.

They will be if the liberal consensus which rules all the above decide that transgenderism is to be the latest sacred cow.

At which point we will probably discover that these trans athletes often finish second and third, and will suspect the winner of using drugs. Just like most runners up.

An interesting point given the amount of drugs required for transgendering. It was discovered in cycling (shortly after by cyclists) that quite common cures, eg for asthma, could power Bradley Wiggins all the way to victory in the Tour de France. If it is found that transgender drugs give an advantage (over and above transgendering) then a tricky decision will face WADA.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The track cycling has started. (I nearly wrote trick cycling but that's not being introduced until Paris.) This will be the first Olympiad without Dave Brailsford and the Sky Bag of Tricks pulling the strings so expect an avalanche of medals going in everybody else's directions. It started first thing when the men's 4000 metre team pursuit, which we always win at a canter, would have found us outside the medals but for an Aussie handlebar disintegrating. So they haven't forgotten all the old tricks.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I bring you news from across the water. Giles Scott (not Giles Gilbert Scott, the ecclesiastical architect) is several nautical miles ahead of the next dude with one race left. All he's got to do to win gold is not cross the line early and have to go back and start again. So he crosses the line early, goes back, starts again and eventually wins gold by edging into fourth place by half a boat length. It's the way Drake would have done it. Charlie Drake.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

We're back on track with the 4000m men's pursuit final. Spotting that we are losing by a street to the Danes, we cunningly detach one of our lads to loiter with intent. Right on cue the Danes, head down for aerodynamic effect intent on setting a new world record, crash into our man and come down in a heap. The commissars are deep in enclave on this one.

You win some, you get the other team DNF'd on some.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Bradley Wiggins, last seen on a motorbike weaving in and out of the peloton during the Tour de France ostensibly reporting for Eurosport ("A lot of the guys were trying to high-five me with their fists, they're a great bunch of lads") is proving an ace conniver in his new role, weaving in and out of the commissariat in the well of the velodrome, ostensibly reporting for Eurosport. "There's talk they may DQ both teams and award gold to the Aussies." So that's put paid to that idea.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Should we extend the vote to Olympic medal-winners? To be honest, I just don't know.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

"And Scott has put himself in exactly the right position..."

To do what? It's the third lap in the twelve-lap 5000 metre semis, so not to strike for home. What he's done is used a whole bunch of energy in order to come through the pack and position himself on the shoulder of the lead runner. Which leaves us with this familiar AE position:

Ex-international athlete: "And Scott has put himself in exactly the right position..."
Ex-bunker off from cross-country: "And Scott has placed himself in the very worst position, out in lane two so has to run an extra ten yards a lap; no protection from wind resistance; unable to influence the pace which is still dictated by the lead runner; but still liable to be jostled by other runners from behind, the one justification for leaving the pack."

Which of us was right? Well, Scott agreed with me and soon returned to the inside lane, safe among the pack, and qualified easily. Now for Round Two.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

What is the one piece of intellectual endeavour required of a five thousand metre runner at the Olympics? Find out the qualifying conditions. [It's first six by right and the four fastest losers, if he had.] So Andy Butchart is on the crown of the last bend, fourth place, going like a train. He is then jostled from behind and by the time he gets back in stride six assorted foreigners are out of reach making a bee-line for the tape. So he just gives up. Failed to qualify for the final as a fastest loser by point something something of a second.

I blame comprehensive education. Alf Tupper would never have made that mistake. Because he went to a secondary modern.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Those of you brought up on Kenneth Wolstenholme will/will not be surprised to hear that the modern sports commentator is required to go several hours with nothing much to report. This began with marathons (the races, I mean, not the commentating stints, well actually I do mean that, well whatever I mean I'd better get on with it or you'll be accusing me of it) and reached its apogee (we thought) with the Grand cycling Tours where six hours of watching cyclists riding along in a bunch chatting amiably followed by a thirty second sprint proved no challenge at all.

Enter the Olympic ten kilometre swim. The problem here is not so much nothing happening as nobody being identifiable. Every fifteen minutes or so the competitors pass something or other and their names go up on the screen in the sequence they pass the something or other. Almost invariably in the same order as fifteen minutes before. The commentators were nevertheless non-stop. There should be some sort of Olympic event for them to enter. We Brits could do well even though we are not known for our volubility. There will have to be strict checks that others are actually commentating. Who knows what they are saying?
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Further to the above and, sorry, I know I do go on about it, does anyone know whether swimmers do or do not benefit from swimming behind another swimmer. Is it less water resistance or churned up more? Ignore being kicked in the mouth for these purposes.

Come on, Brailsford, fill one of your wind tunnels with brine and put the Ineos practice squad in there to find out!
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
Enter the Olympic ten kilometre swim.

True story. I once swam against the then current European 1500 metre freestyle champion and lost. Details here (of him, not me) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Black_
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:

I blame comprehensive education. Alf Tupper would never have made that mistake. Because he went to a secondary modern.


Only the toffee nosed snobs, such as Skimba Ru, the wealthy son of a Zulu chief, or flash American, Lash Lannigan, would ever try for this. No, Alf was simply for the true run race, normally after putting in a hard shift of all-night welding, the night before. It's against everything he ran for, a silly rule that is there for the snooty public school shamateurs. Alf always ran to win

"Tough of the track" would never have contemplated qualifying as a fastest loser.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Wrong, as usual, though you were right about the welding. Breathing the fumes all week led to him losing the race on the Saturday, but he did qualify as a runner-up for the Big Race on the following Saturday. He asked the foreman if he could switch over to mowing grass verges and a full five and a half days of breathing in the sweet zephyrs of Old England resulted in the inevitable triumph.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Talking of Alf Tupper, Sebastian Coe was interviewed trackside yesterday.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

India have avoided the follow-on.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 164, 165, 166 ... 260, 261, 262  Next

Jump to:  
Page 165 of 262

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group