MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The role of belief in knowledge (APPLIED EPISTEMOLOGY)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Also we like feeling superior to other people

I have found that not to be the main problem. It is the demand for equality that does most of the harm.

whether they are foreigners or our ancestors or even our own people, witness the hatred of Brexiteers or Trump supporters.

Why have you selected that example? It would have been more telling if you had said, "Witness the hatred of Brexiteers and Trump supporters towards their opponents."

Any myth which plugs into this is halfway to acceptance

You mean being wreckers plugs into the superiority of the British?
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

For those of you that don't live on the coast and are not entrusted with our great nation's defence, then the practice of luring, by beacon, Johnny Foreigner to his demise, wrecking his vessel and then salvaging what is of value, might seem unkind, but I don't seem to remember that you were complaining about this when the Spanish Armada was off the coast, or the French were rampaging through the streets of Southampton. It seems more than reasonable to Wiley that we used to be paid for this service, defending aganst foreign raids, and in fact we used to be before the Red Coats took over.

This is after all why we celebrate Guy Fawkes night properly along the coast, with beacons and payments for service, for the killing of popish foreigners.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

So you agree the crime of 'wrecking' doesn't exist even though people on land can act abominably towards people in distress at sea. It's good to have your support, Wiley.

N.B. The armed forces. Please do not take adverse action against offshore vessels at night as they are usually ours not theirs.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Heavon forbid. We don't wreck our side, it's only Johnny Foreigner who is arranging a fiendidsh raid at a small inlet or cove, normally with the help of some traitorous popish catholic posh landowning type. You have to uncover the plot, normally by torture, for this to work.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Let me get the picture accurately in my mind. We have tortured some domestic malcontents to spill the beans about an imminent raid by their foreign paymasters. They are going to land in Loxley Cove on Tuesday night. We put out some lights to lure them onto the Loxley Reef next door. Captain Frenchman says, "By jeuve, why are zair lights, numero un? I sought zis was supposed to be ze surprise."

Take it from there, Mr du Maurier.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Thankfully our native cunning is more than a match for their devilish behaviour.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Warning! Archaeologists at Work

-------------------

Stanwick Lakes Country: England Topic: Museums
Stanwick Lakes are building their own Bronze Age boat with the help of Dr James Dilley of Ancient Craft. Lots of other heritage plans in the pipeline, including another round house for the ancient village and improvements to the setting of the large round barrow nearby. Stanwick Lakes visitor centre has a Heritage Zone, created to display the many artefacts that were found on the site during the extensive archaeological excavations in the 1980s. You will find displays that tell the story of the past settlers who have lived here over the last 10,000 years. http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=58622

-----------------

Goldington Country: England Topic: Neolithic and Bronze Age
A shopfloor artwork mnemonic and plaque commemorating a Neolithic henge and timber circle, the remains of which are concealed beneath this Tesco superstore in Riverfield Park, Bedford. http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=6509

-----------------

Glastonbury Stone Circle Country: England Topic: Modern Sites
A Carhenge is part of Glastonbury 2023 - added to this page as it's a temporary installation. More photos linked from here. The Glastonbury Festival stone circle is a recent monument on the British landscape, yet it is one that is visited by huge numbers of people over a very short period of time. Estimates of the numbers of people gathering at the Glastonbury stone circle are subject to speculation, however with a large proportion of the hundreds of thousands of people at festival visiting the stone circle its influence and draw is undisputed. http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=45067
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

This Week's Competition

Identify the bit that tells you the writer wants to impress and amaze you as opposed to just telling you

To solve these problems, researchers from the Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology assembled an international team of over 80 language specialists to construct a new dataset of core vocabulary from 161 Indo-European languages, including 52 ancient or historical languages.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

You all got it! The reporter knew the number of languages down to the last digit but could only venture 'over eighty' when it came to the number of researchers. This can only be because the people in charge didn't know, which seems unlikely, or they recognised that by saying, say

an international team of eighty-three language specialists

reminds the reader that these are just a bunch of individuals collectively but individually (not at the Max Planck) doodling away on the backs of envelopes which, if you read the original here https://phys.org/news/2023-07-insights-indo-european-languages.html is pretty much what they did. 'Over eighty' makes it sound like the finest minds of linguistics have been gathered together to solve the problem once and for all.

Fun fact: they came up with the place predicted by THOBR!
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

And memorably re-iterated in RevHist

----------------

....leaving India. British India.

The early study of languages was dominated by English- and German-speakers so when English-speakers found, quelle surprise, there were links between English and Sanskrit that was very good news. The German-speakers were happy to agree, they had English in their pocket. Presto! European languages belonged to the mighty superfamily of Indo-European. The amount of science might be nugatory but by the time everything had been tidied up into Linguistics and the iron rule of academic life – First is Best – had worked its magic, the patrons of the Dog & Duck not only knew where their language came from, they could be proud of the superfamily it belonged to

“English is a Germanic language.”
“Why can’t German be an Englishic language?”
“Because English is evolved from Anglo-Saxon and that’s a Germanic language.”
“Yes, I’d heard that.”
“There’s a Germanic group, a Latinate group, a Celtic group and a Slavic group which together form the Western Indo-European branch.”
“Why do you call it that?”
“Aryan has unfortunate connotations.”
“No, I mean why Western, Indo and branch?”
“In simple terms, it was recognised that English and Sanskrit had certain modalities in common which, what with one thing and another, led to the identification of the Indo-European language family.”
“I thought there was no evidence of how languages evolved.”
“Direct evidence, perhaps, but we can make textual examinations of existing languages plus various extinct languages, our fossils, if you will.”
“Fascinating. How’s it done? Briefly.”
“If a word from Language A sounds like a word from Language B, and they are not loanwords, they must both be derived from a common root-word.”
“Why not from one another?”
“They just aren’t. Are you evolved from your mother or from your sister? Once we have identified enough root-words, we can recreate whole languages. In this case ‘proto-Indic’ from which all the Indo-European languages evolved.”
“Impressive. When was all this happening?”
“That I couldn’t say. We’re talking aeons.”
“Not so impressive. Do you know where it was happening?”
“Central Asia.”
“You mean between India and Europe?”
“Quite.”
“But according to this President Erdogan everyone in central Asia speaks Turkic.”
“There may have been a vacuum after the migrations to India and Europe.”
“Makes a lot of sense. Can I get you another?”
“Please. I’ll have it in a straight glass, if you wouldn’t mind. It makes drinking a bit awkward.”
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I got a notification of this via academia.edu

Ideology An Introduction • TERRY EAGLETON VERSO London· New York

For those of you with short memories or none, Eagleton was a famously ideological English don of the last century -- he may still be at it, for all I know -- but it got me to musing how qualified such an ideological person is to write a book about ideology. He probably means other people's ideologies since he won't be aware he has one. Putting the word 'Introduction' in the title is promisingly modest though it usually denotes a potboiler.

As to his general capabilities I can report this story. ("I think you mean repeat, Mick.") In the days when THOBR first came out and was generating some waves I got into a correspondence with Terry, him being a senior Eng Lit man at the time rather than an All-Purpose Fulminator, and I was giving him the runaround. ("Course you were, Mick, we had every faith.")

What mildly impressed me was that he was quite prepared to be given an ongoing runaround. He fought his corner with great energy. But finally I had managed to corral him into a position that was 180 degrees the opposite of the one he had started with! It was really quite extraordinary -- and actually did him a lot of credit in terms of his powers of logical exposition.

However, when I pointed this out I never heard from him again.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
I got a notification of this via academia.edu

Ideology An Introduction • TERRY EAGLETON VERSO London· New York

For those of you with short memories or none, Eagleton was a famously ideological English don of the last century -- he may still be at it, for all I know -- but it got me to musing how qualified such an ideological person is to write a book about ideology. He probably means other people's ideologies since he won't be aware he has one. Putting the word 'Introduction' in the title is promisingly modest though it usually denotes a potboiler.


Putting the word Introduction in the title shows that the Archbishop is going to help you, so you might with a lot of hard work make Deacon.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

This is as may be but what generally happens is that a publisher approaches 'a man in the news' to see if he is up for a book. The bloke replies that he's hard at work on his opus and there's no chance. The publisher then casts around for something The Great Man can do in between times, with reasonable dispatch and on a topic that might have a bit of mileage. (The opus offers none of these things.)

The GM responds with cautious noncommittal. Various topics are suggested, mulled over and rejected until eventually there is a melding of minds. However both parties know the score so the word Introduction is introduced.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I thought it would be fun, to provide a radical re reading, of possible meaning by interpreting what was implicit, but unsaid, in the original title. I took into account the social, political and historial context of what was happening to the study of literary criticism, at the time.

On reflection. I was just being nasty to the author.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I thought this piece from Medium would be useful for an exploration of the relationship between AE and politics. As I have got puce in the face saying, youse guys have no trouble being AE-ist with most things but as soon as it’s politics, you go into ‘I know what I believe and I’m sticking to it’ mode.

The Early History of Conservatism Douglas Giles, PhD
The modern right-wing has its roots in a particular historical event
An excerpt from my forthcoming book, Left Wing, Right Wing, People, and Power.

https://dgilesphilosopher.medium.com/the-early-history-of-conservatism-e395b6f6fa41

The original piece is very long so I won’t necessarily be punching holes in all of it. And since I haven’t read it yet (I am using the AE technique of analysis in real time so the overall message doesn't get in the way) maybe not that many holes either.

Douglas Giles wrote:
The earliest uses of “Left” and “Right” in politics did not reflect political philosophies or ideologies. Instead, they indicated support for or opposition to a particular government. “Left” and “Right” as relative terms came from their first uses in the days of the French Revolution. In 1789 in the French Legislative Assembly, supporters of the king chose to group themselves sitting to the right of the assembly president, and opponents of the king sat opposite them on the left. The French newspapers of the time used the terms “the Left” and “the Right” to describe the opposing sides, and the usage spread throughout Europe.

No arguments with that. It is interesting – maybe significant – that there are two ways you can lay out a legislative chamber (1) the French way, in an arc facing nobody except ‘the Speaker’ (2) the English way (not the new Scottish way, if you've noticed) in rows of benches facing one another. It makes a difference when it comes to a priori seat-selection (or ‘crossing the floor’ if it comes to that). Left and right is literal in the first, but maybe more ingrained in the second. more/
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Jump to:  
Page 4 of 5

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group