THE Ice Age (NEW CONCEPTS)

[Mick Harper]

So the earth has shifted since 0 AD.

[Mick Harper]

No, of course since 400 AD. Hence the Dark Ages.

[Ishmael]

When a road can go anywhere -- that is when it isn't expressly designed to go from place A directly to place B -- it will tend to follow the cardinal directions. Look at that map of the continental USA. The dominant axis is the compass.

Yet these "Roman Roads" break the rule. They don't align to the cardinal points at all. And yet...

....and yet....

...they remain generally aligned to a cross-axis. But the axis to which they align is misaligned from the compass. Misaligned from true north.

Misaligned by about....

...maybe...

....23.5 degrees.

[Ishmael]

[Ishmael]

However, I have a bigger problem because I alone know what is necessary to move the pole -- and it's not a SLOT event -- and I am very reluctant to posit the presence of that factor at such a recent date.

All of us, however, would have a problem with all these pole jumps. Nailing down the chronology is getting harder. We all seem to want to put a pole in or near Hudson Bay but, was this the most recent position?

We do have evidence other than these road systems indicating the presence of an Asian pole. The "Roman Roads" uncannily reflect that pole position. We had thought that Asian pole to have been older than the Hudson Bay pole.

And then there was a third pole posited by us to the east of Greenland. Was that pole really there or is it an error on our part?

Is it possible that Earth's axis recently tipped all the way around from Hudson Bay to Norway before tilting once more and finally back to an intermediate position? If so, why would both preliminary poles have been located 23.5 degrees from present true north?

Mystery upon mystery.

[Ishmael]

IF this road arrangement is the product of there having been a different pole in recent times then it poses another problem for those who hold to the historical record; for if such a pole shift took place within the historical era it would certainly have been recorded. We have a number of options then.

1) I am wrong. The roads were never aligned to the cardinal points.
2) The roads were laid down and the pole shift occurred prior to the historical era (yet these are roads that span -- pay attention to that word -- the continent from Constantinople to London).
3) The historical record actually begins much more recently than believed and "ancient" history was forged.

[Chad]

These roads then pre-date Giza, which is aligned to the present pole.

[Ishmael]

[Ishmael]

I'm really impressed by the stark empty space to the north-east tilted almost perfectly to an approximate 20 degree angle. It's almost like the area was desolate -- like something no-longer there was once occupying the space and preventing humans from doing so.

[Ishmael]

I wonder what it could have been.....

[Ishmael]

Might it possibly have been....



THIS:



Another view...

[Ishmael]

And will this not explain perfectly why the roads that SPAN the European Empire do not enter Scotland or Ireland?

[Ishmael]

Thing about this glaciation stuff though is that Orthodoxy holds that the glaciers actually came much farther south than these maps show. However, they maintain that the more southern extremes were reached only in the previous ice age.

But as I can't support the notion of there having been an ice age prior to the last one (and the last ice age is actually two separate pole shifts).

This for example was supposed to have been the glacial situation 50,000 years ago.

[Ishmael]

I am officially astounded. I don't know what to make of this.

And yet it is 100% consistent with my thesis. Moreover, it is absolutely necessary to my thesis.

[N R Scott]