MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Politics, The Final Frontier (Politics)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 34, 35, 36 ... 104, 105, 106  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

If I understand you a'right, you are positing a historical chain of liberals and that each new generation of liberals denounces previous generations of liberals. You have created the impression that you yourself belong to one or other of these past generations of liberals but that cannot be, because a) you would understand that all liberals are proved to have been in error eventually and b) AE principles do not allow you to be a liberal of any stripe, of any generation.

Is that right?
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

1) Everything else being equal, liberals are morally and culturally superior, to the rest of us.

It is not a fashionable view, but there you go, liberals embrace not just each other (they are normally touchy feely types) but equality, justice, generosity, toleration, animal welfare, they are open to new ideas, cultures, whilst they oppose racism, cruelty and the death penalty.

Consider the democratic debate. They were discussing the level of reparations that needed to be paid to people of colour for having ancestors who were slaves.

Marianne Williamson wrote:
“If you did the math of the 40 acres and a mule, given that there were 4 to 5 million slaves at the end of the Civil War,” Williamson said, “it would be trillions of dollars, and I believe that anything less than $100 billion is an insult.”
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

2) Everything else being equal, liberal morality will continue to displace or reinvent traditional religious belief whilst remaining tolerant towards newer minority beliefs.

People increasingly now tend to choose their religion on the basis of their own values. As liberalism is morally and culturally superior to other isms, it is not surprising that liberalism is displacing or reinventing traditional religious belief, that might otherwise be a threat to liberal values.

Minority beliefs that pose no immediate threat will however be tolerated.

Liberalism is morally and culturally superior to religion.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

3) The economic success of western liberalism has led to the development of a new improved system of compassionate morality, namely liberal morality.

Whilst this is not a simple relationship, there is an undeniable relationship, namely the morality would not exist without the economic progress.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

You do know how to provoke one, Wiley.

Everything else being equal, liberals are morally and culturally superior, to the rest of us.

I don't like the opening or closing stanzas but liberals are morally and culturally superior because they fetishise both qualities. It's why AE opposes them -- we don't fetishise anything.

It is not a fashionable view, but there you go, liberals embrace not just each other (they are normally touchy feely types) but equality, justice, generosity, toleration, animal welfare, they are open to new ideas, cultures, whilst they oppose racism, cruelty and the death penalty.

This is complete horse manure. I daresay the current crop are like this but would you say it was true of, say, Sir Robert Peel? Stalin was big on equality, Hitler was perfervid on the subject of animal welfare, Judge Jeffreys was a huge fan of justice.

Consider the democratic debate. They were discussing the level of reparations that needed to be paid to people of colour for having ancestors who were slaves.

Now you are beginning to understand liberalism. Non-liberals (in this case black radicals) are always putting forward crazy schemes, liberals just soothe them away.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Everything else being equal, liberal morality will continue to displace or reinvent traditional religious belief whilst remaining tolerant towards newer minority beliefs.

It is true, by definition, that liberalism cannot flourish when traditional religious belief dominates any given society, but liberalism fetishises a strict separation of religion and state for this exact reason. Blimey, they invented Anglicanism, didn't they? After that they couldn't give a toss what anyone believes. Why should they?

People increasingly now tend to choose their religion on the basis of their own values.

Are you kidding? Nobody chooses a religion. They go with their parents' religion or they decide not to have one.

As liberalism is morally and culturally superior to other isms, it is not surprising that liberalism is displacing or reinventing traditional religious belief, that might otherwise be a threat to liberal values.

See above.

Minority beliefs that pose no immediate threat will however be tolerated.

See above.

Liberalism is morally and culturally superior to religion.

It has certainly proved more seductive.

The economic success of western liberalism has led to the development of a new improved system of compassionate morality, namely liberal morality.

I think you will find that economic success allows for all sorts of goodies including improved compassionate morality, if that's what you want.

Whilst this is not a simple relationship, there is an undeniable relationship, namely the morality would not exist without the economic progress.

There you go. Nothing to do with liberalism. Have a look at China, why don't you?
Send private message
Grant



View user's profile
Reply with quote

Liberals are pretty dumb. Consider how they hate Donald Trump so much they are proposing reparations for black people, the one thing that will guarantee that Trump wins. Even the Hispanics will vote for him next year if they do that.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I am often asked which are dumber, liberals or conservatives? This is not as easy as both sides believe. It is true that conservatives are correct more of the time but since they are defending the known (.i.e. the status quo) they are dealing with easier problems. Liberals are posed difficult questions and while it is true they don't have to think them up for themselves -- radicals do that -- they do have to choose the answers and then get them applied. But, would come the conservative rejoinder, we have to clear up the mess and that's never straightforward. I'll have to get back to you on this one.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

4) Everything else being equal liberalism will defeat utopian attempts to reorganise society more collectively in opposition to liberal values. Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Anarchism.etc are in essence primitive early attempts to disrupt progressive liberalism.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Actually, Wiley, what you are saying (and it was worth saying) is that liberalism is the default position. We lose sight of this because it is only in a minority of countries (in the world and in history) that it is technically feasible. Most of the time conditions are such that the state has to be organised in a top-down way. (I took your inclusion of anarchism as humorous.)

You can see this more clearly in discussions of 'capitalism', 'the free market', 'the unseen hand' and so forth. In every society human beings enter into relatively unorganised, self-regulating and across-the-board economic relationships. It is the default and only when it is interfered with do we have to give it a name. Liberalism is really only the normal way social animals with brains organise themselves to mutual advantage, for better or worse. It is a typical error of both left and right commentators that they believe this benign state of affairs is going to come to an end any time soon. Freedom is not achieved by eternal vigilance, it just is. Sometimes it becomes isn't but eternal vigilance is more likely to bring that about than just leaving well alone.

This is why, Wiley, you are a liberal no matter how much you squirm.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Grant wrote:
Liberals are pretty dumb. Consider how they hate Donald Trump so much they are proposing reparations for black people, the one thing that will guarantee that Trump wins. Even the Hispanics will vote for him next year if they do that.


Wiley wrote:
I try my best to be a liberal, but I let myself down by refusing to judge actors (other than me of course) by their motivation but instead by their effect.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

5) Liberals feel guilty because of their widespread belief that the earliest phases of economic liberalism were largely unregulated, and resulted in much misery. This results in a real (in their eyes) debt owed to less affluent people by more affluent people.

Neoliberalism is perceived as a return to the earlier, now hated form of economic liberalism, but worse.

Whereas early forms of economic liberalism are seen to be economically progressive but culturally and morally regressive, neoliberalism is seen to be economically, culturally and morally regressive.

Neoliberalism is as a consequence often conflated with fascism by liberals.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

6) Everything else being equal liberals will slowly take over all traditional institutions, for example this is now occurring in the house of lords and (cripes) monarchy!
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Liberals feel guilty because of their widespread belief that the earliest phases of economic liberalism were largely unregulated, and resulted in much misery.

I like this, it's something I'm always banging on about. The pernicious belief that everybody was miserable not just in the past but anywhere your own preferred system is not being applied with full vigour. We used to call it 'Acacia Drive Syndrome'.

This results in a real (in their eyes) debt owed to less affluent people by more affluent people.

Again a favourite theme. Affluent people always have a vested interest in making sure less affluent people don't come round and biff them on the head. What you call the process varies.

Neoliberalism is perceived as a return to the earlier, now hated form of economic liberalism, but worse.

A simple application of 'everyone was miserable in the past' doctrine. We here know all about the uses and abuses of attaching 'neo' to anything.

Whereas early forms of economic liberalism are seen to be economically progressive but culturally and morally regressive, neoliberalism is seen to be economically, culturally and morally regressive.

A simple application of 'everyone in the past was miserable' doctrine.

Neoliberalism is as a consequence often conflated with fascism by liberals.

A simple application of 'everyone is miserable when my own preferred system is not rigorously applied' doctrine. Overall, Wiley, aren't you making an error of scale? This is mostly political knockabout, surely. I don't think neoliberalsim is linked with fascism so much as populism is linked to fascism and populists and neo-liberals are temporary allies in the fight against ordinary liberals. Although I agree Rees-Mogg needs watching.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Although Boris and Trump (and most of the populists emerging all over the shop) are buffoons, it has to be accepted that the current liberal logjam is better overthrown by buffoons than by people who know what they are doing.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 34, 35, 36 ... 104, 105, 106  Next

Jump to:  
Page 35 of 106

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group