MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
The Sweet Track (Megalithic)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 23, 24, 25  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Keimpe


In: Leeuwarden, Frisia
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Apart from http://www.googleearthanomalies.com where would one report such a thing?

(Mick, it's OK to say you're impressed)
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Huh, I suppose so. But let's have a look at what we've actually got. Vast swathes of British archaeology derive from various national aerial surveys and the consequent discovery and exploitation of cropmarks -- evidence not discoverable any other way. On the other hand these aerial surveys were not undertaken for the purpose of discovering cropmarks so we can be sure that there are plenty still undiscovered (they only show up in certain lights, from certain angles, at certain times of the year etc etc).

Now Google Earth is just, as it were, the latest national aerial survey so naturally it will pick up some cropmarks that older surveys did not. But at Avebury? This must be one of the few places in Britain that actually has had specialist archaeological aerial surveys done. Therefore we can conclude that this Google one is modern.

But this raises a separate problem, looking at the obverse. Googling Avebury must be one of the most frequent uses of Google Earth -- and performed by people on the lookout for weird stuff just like this -- so what chance nobody has seen this? Nil.

So, Keimpe, report on two things
a) your emotional and intellectual reactions on discovering this and
b) your best estimates of what you would have done if you had discovered it idly as opposed to part of a wider investigation.

PS Is there a World's Best Crop Circle Gallery anywhere, and if so how do you search it without having to go through the whole lot?
Send private message
Ishmael


In: Toronto
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Found it.

http://dancingawakethefifthworld.com/crop_circle_050716_wiltshire_waden_hill_avebury.jpg
Send private message
Ishmael


In: Toronto
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Personally, I was more intrigued by the straight line through the field directly to Avebury. And as we can see, that wasn't part of the recent crop circle.
Send private message
Keimpe


In: Leeuwarden, Frisia
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:

So, Keimpe, report on two things
a) your emotional and intellectual reactions on discovering this and


I knew it was something, which was thrilling, but I also knew I could not possibly be the first to spot it, so I was not overly excited about it.


b) your best estimates of what you would have done if you had discovered it idly as opposed to part of a wider investigation.


That's impossible to say. Nobody goes zooming in on Avebury without a reason. I think I would have been much more surprised/excited, had I found this in the middle of the Frisian country side.


PS Is there a World's Best Crop Circle Gallery anywhere, and if so how do you search it without having to go through the whole lot?


I think http://www.cropcircleconnector.com is pretty big and it has a Search feature, although more than half the search results lead to non-existing pages.
Send private message
Keimpe


In: Leeuwarden, Frisia
View user's profile
Reply with quote



Amazing!

(and lo, if I type: Avebury crop circle on Google and let it search for images, there it is....why didn't I think of that!?)
Send private message
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Personally, I was more intrigued by the straight line through the field directly to Avebury. And as we can see, that wasn't part of the recent crop circle.

I was walking along a straight footpath that went diagonally (diagonal or dragonal) across a wheatfield towards Chipping Norton en route to the Rollright stone circle and noted a 'circle' beside the track. I remember thinking 'crop or stone circle? nah, must be a coincidence' except that a) the completely uninteresting wheatfield is marked Greystones on the OS map and b) the whole area is replete with tumuli, barrows, earthworks, ancient-looking stones often in unlikely places, you name it. If it hadn't been for the suggestive name I wouldn't have noticed the field, in other words it made me actively look (and also predisposed me to 'see' something!).

There's even supposed to be a Serpent's Well in Chipping 'cept no-one seems to know where it's located. It's plain there once existed stone circles or stone somethings which at some stage were removed/cleared to make way for building or agricultural projects.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

So what is the 'chipping' in Chipping Norton? Where the stonemasons used to work?
Send private message
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Chipping is supposed to be derived from ceapen meaning 'market' as in Cheapside. I'd rather fancied a connection with people 'chipping' off bits of stone "for good luck" but that's no doubt fanciful.

There are tremendous earthworks denoting a castle on the hill overlooking St. Mary's church, could be where the fabled well was situated as the Sar brook runs alongside the path that follows the line of the banks. Bit odd that, considering Chipping is supposed to be the highest town in Oxfordshire.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

This reminds me that in the Battle of the Saints we have to find a way of distinguishing between Mary, Jesus' mom, and Mary Magdalen, Jesus's doxy. Only the latter is presumably significant in this context.
Send private message
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

in the Battle of the Saints we have to find a way of distinguishing between Mary, Jesus' mom, and Mary Magdalen, Jesus's doxy. Only the latter is presumably significant in this context.

Mmm. Not so sure about that, having just learned that the doctrine of Immaculate Conception was officially enshrined in Catholic ideology as late as 1854. The role of the earth mother that many believe to have been welnigh universal, with some justification, is admirably suited to Mary (mum).
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Well, the Immaculate Conception was performed on Ann, the mother of Mary, not Mary herself ie Mary was immaculately conceived to make sure no trace of mucky stuff attached to her. But all this nineteenth century Ultramontane ideology is completely irrelevant (the doctrine of Papal Infallibility comes from the same era) being mostly internal French Second Empire politics.

The point is that Mary Magdalen, aka the Black Madonna, has some affinities with Megalithia -- however 'allegedly' -- whereas the Virgin Mary is (unless we can come up with something else) just Earth Mother writ late, as you suggest. But my guess is that there is much more to come on this.
Send private message
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Well I don't want to get involved in complicated doctrinal issues but the way I see it black madonnas are 'earthy' and protective, quintessential mother-figures; blackness is traditionally equated with fertility. They are invariably found by shepherd boys usually in caves in hillsides. Shades of sacred groves perhaps, almost certainly Platoesque. (cf. Egypt, or Kemet, the 'black land' from the black Nile mud that refertilises the land every year).
Send private message
Keimpe


In: Leeuwarden, Frisia
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Spotted this one as well:



which turned out to be probably this one:



It's the aliens saying Mick's theory is right. Avebury is at the heart of the megalithic trackway system. Congrats Mick!
Send private message
Chad


In: Ramsbottom
View user's profile
Reply with quote

which turned out to be probably this one:


Right field...wrong position.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 23, 24, 25  Next

Jump to:  
Page 4 of 25

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group