MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Matters Arising (The History of Britain Revealed)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 218, 219, 220 ... 239, 240, 241  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

On the contrary, the place is best remembered for Blind Jack of Knaresborough who invented roads.
Send private message
nemesis8


In: byrhfunt
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Hatty wrote:

Noah's dove didn't discover land, that was the raven's job, but brought back information as a reliable messenger must. Do messengers have to be killed to safeguard trade secrets?


There is pages and pages of biblical stuff.

Simple.

Its day/life/light/fate overcoming night/death/dark/tricks

So Dover.

http://bit.ly/y4iFUU
Send private message
Pulp History


In: Wales
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The Romans called it Dubris (or Duvris) presumably from the current name of the place. The only similar word in Anglo Saxon is Dufan which means to 'dive' or 'drown' - could be memories of the flooding of the English Channel?
_________________
Question everything!
Send private message
Pulp History


In: Wales
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The university of Wales give their 'proto-celtic' word 'Dubro' to mean water, without giving any clue as to where that comes from.

The examples they give are Dubro = Water, Dubro-Jara = Water Hen, and Dubro-Kwon = Otter.

It seems to me that all of these words are more easily explained if the Dubro root is interpreted closer to the Anglo Saxon meaning of 'to dive'. Seems again that the word could easily have travelled the other way just as easily.
_________________
Question everything!
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Hatty wrote:
Dover is connected via a so-called Roman trade route to Trier and Cologne via Boulogne. Ursula or Little Bear, a 'British princess', went on a pan-European pilgrimage ending at Cologne or Köln where she was murdered.

Noah's dove didn't discover land, that was the raven's job, but brought back information as a reliable messenger must. Do messengers have to be killed to safeguard trade secrets?


No, but doves taste better than ravens.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Unless you're ravenous of course. The etymology of which is the usual risible rubbish viz

early 15c., "obsessed with plundering, extremely greedy," from O.Fr. ravinos "rapacious, violent," from raviner "to seize," from ravine "violent rush, robbery" (see ravine). Meaning "voracious, very hungry" is from early 15c. Related: Ravenously.

Misses the point entirely.
Send private message
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Dover (and by extension Salisbury) is connected to Cologne/Coln via pigeons. Or Ursula Minor if you prefer great circle routes, via Dunkirk and Gent.

Cologne cathedral is the finest Gothic structure in Europe, even the philistine RAF let it be.
Send private message
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Pardonnez-moi. The Flemish landing point on the Dover-Coln route is Koksijdge, just east of Dunkirk and site of Dunes Abbey (from where the Cistercian monks relocated to Bruges in the seventeenth century).
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Oh no, trouble at t' language mill:

http://www.newsinenglish.no/2012/11/27/english-is-a-scandinavian-language/

So a bunch of gen-u-wine academics have proved linguistically that English doesn't come from Anglo-Saxon. Of course they're a bunch of Scandischmucks so the Anglo-American rulers of the academic universe won't actually notice. Still it's the straw in the wind that will eventually break the camel's back.
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
Oh no, trouble at t' language mill:

http://www.newsinenglish.no/2012/11/27/english-is-a-scandinavian-language/

So a bunch of gen-u-wine academics have proved linguistically that English doesn't come from Anglo-Saxon. Of course they're a bunch of Scandischmucks so the Anglo-American rulers of the academic universe won't actually notice. Still it's the straw in the wind that will eventually break the camel's back.


Maybe we should ask the occupants of Doggerland what they spoke?
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Here is the original article with examples.


http://www.apollon.uio.no/english/articles/2012/4-english-scandinavian.html
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Wile E. Coyote wrote:
Here is the original article with examples.

http://www.apollon.uio.no/english/articles/2012/4-english-scandinavian.html


""Have you considered how easy it is for us Norwegians to learn English?"
Fair enough, but why is it so hard for English-speakers to learn Norwegian? I have a friend who's moved to Norway, funnily enough from Northampton, which is East Midlands. But he swears learning Norwegian is the most painful thing he's ever done.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Actually this gives the lie to all notions of creolisation that orthodoxy relies on, eg Anglo-Saxon incorporating swathes of Norman French. Once a language moves even a small way (say, Spanish ... French) it is impossible for either group to understand the other. And two language groups form eg English and Urdu in Birmingham today (or Karachi for that matter). It makes no difference how related the two languages are.

One group may learn the language of the other but there is no melding of the languages. A few loan words glide effortlessly between the two in the ordinary way of any two side-by-side languages, but that is all.
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

In that case, can't we claim Old Norwegian is based on Old English? And that New Norwegian has changed more than New English?
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Or that Old Norwegian and Old English are both based on Old-Something-Else-Probably-Underwater?
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 218, 219, 220 ... 239, 240, 241  Next

Jump to:  
Page 219 of 241

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group