MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
All Things Roman (History)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 23, 24, 25
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Fake History Hunter who I came across on Twitter did a pretty neat job of obliterating oubliettes

Fake History Hunter wrote:

So, what about the Oubliette? If you've been to a castle you've probably been shown a hole in the floor with the claim that it was an oubliette; a dungeon you were thrown in from the top and then LEFT TO DIE.
Truly the stuff of nightmares, I remember shivering when told this..

BUT... were they really a thing?
Some castles didn't even have regular dungeons, they needed basements for storage, space is precious!

And some rooms that people once thought were dungeons or oubliettes are now speculated to have been storage rooms, ice cellars or maybe cisterns, part of a water system (!), like this one at the Paris La Bastille


Reluctance to forego ingrained assumptions can lead to citing the usual suspect sources. The mention of the Bastille prompted René Seindal, a Danish historian who leads history walks in Venice, into referring us to Caesar

In Roman times the Mamertine prison was such a dungeon. Vercingetorix stayed there some ten years before Caesar has time to get him strangled in public.

The earliest written mention of Vercingetorix is in De Bello Gallico but we've been down that Roman road. More to the point, it turns out Mamertine prison was a Roman cistern originally with a number of underground chambers. The lower chamber contained a central circular structure called a ‘tholos’. The water spring was found to be part of the original flooring with what are said to be votive offerings (ceramic shards, fauna, burnt small animal bones). According to the report

"We have confirmed the religious aspect of the site and this was linked to a water spring, traces of which have been found along with votive deposits from the sixth to the third centuries BC."

http://heritage-key.com/blogs/bija/excavations-mamertine-prison-find-evidence-pre-christian-cult-and-cult-saint-peter/

The spring may or may not have given rise to a religious cult but it would suit later builders in stone. A series of Christian wall frescoes painted and repainted from the 11th to 14th century still remain

In the 11th-century, the Santi Pietro e Paolo in Carcere (St. Peter & St. Paul in Prison) Church was built here over the Mamertine Prison, which by legend was the incarceration site of Saint Peter and Saint Paul

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Giuseppe_dei_Falegnami
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Brutus.

Roman surname of the Junian gens. Its association with betrayal traces to Marcus Junius Brutus (c. 85 B.C.E.-42 B.C.E.), statesman and general and conspirator against Caesar. The Brutus (Englished as Brute) who was the mythological eponymous founder of Britain in medieval legend was said to be a descendant of Aeneas the Trojan.

Brutish=British. Oh dear. Don't tell the Welsh.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

the Mamertine Prison, which by legend was the incarceration site of Saint Peter and Saint Paul

Two of the three criminal founding fathers is a proud record.

"What are you in for?"
"Founding a religion. You?"
"Drunk and disorderly."
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Some have suggested that attributing the origin of 'Britain' to the Latin 'Brutus' may be ultimately derived from Isidore of Seville's popular 7th-century work Etymologiae, in which it was speculated that the name of Britain comes from bruti, on the basis that the Britons were, in the eyes of that author, brutes, or savages.[1]

Not just the author.
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
Two of the three criminal founding fathers is a proud record.


Two out of three ain't bad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvSlSYpYtZA
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Wile E. Coyote wrote:
Brutish=British. Oh dear. Don't tell the Welsh.


We need not trouble them.

First recall where Brutus is supposed to have landed. Totnes. Although how he landed at the top of the steep hill is a mystery.

Then recall how William of Orange became King of Britain. He could have just sailed from Holland across the Straits of Dover and up the Thames. But no. To gain legitimacy, he sailed hundreds of miles further west, against the prevailing winds, and landed in Brixham in Devon.

Then recall where the folk emigrated from to give "Little Britain" its name. If you want to learn to speak original Brittonic Cornish, go to Brittany.

Another of the clues is hidden in plain site. The River Brit.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.7336&mlon=-2.7584&zoom=12#map=17/50.71710/-2.76221
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Gosbecks Archaeological Park Country: England Topic: Multi-period
Tours of Gosbecks Archaeological Park - the story of Iron Age and Roman Colchester - Sunday 17th September 2023. Also other Roman remains open in Colchester, more in the comments on our page. Situated on land formerly part of Gosbecks Farm, the Archaeological Park is recognised as one of the most significant Iron-Age and Roman sites in the Essex. Excavations in the fields surrounding the farm (named after the 13th century land owner, Rodger de Gosebek) began in the 19th century with the discovery of a Roman temple by Reverend Henry Jenkins, an amateur archaeologist. However the true scale of the site wasn't known until archaeologists examined aerial photographs of the area in the 1930s. http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=25202

It occurred to me when idly perusing this that if our theory that most Roman history was made up in the period 15th-18th centuries AD is correct, those made-up histories will mention places known about in the 15th-18th centuries but not others discovered since. As the latter are legion (no pun intended) this will provide a statistical argument that would be unanswerable. Someone do it, can they?
Send private message
Ishmael


In: Toronto
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
It occurred to me when idly perusing this that if our theory that most Roman history was made up in the period 15th-18th centuries AD is correct, those made-up histories will mention places known about in the 15th-18th centuries but not others discovered since. As the latter are legion (no pun intended) this will provide a statistical argument that would be unanswerable. Someone do it, can they?


Brilliant.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I thought so. Now work out why it took me so long think of it. But as an exercise in wishful thinking, imagine

1. A team of specialists at, say, the Max Planck doing it
2. They publish it in an unanswerable welters of statistics
3. How do Classicists react?
4. How do historians react (if different to (3)?
5. How do future students react (with their feet)?
6. How does the general public react?

Yes, we know, nothing will happen but we must be left with our dreams.

7. How would we react when we have been shown conclusively to be wrong across the board.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 23, 24, 25

Jump to:  
Page 25 of 25

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group