MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Questions Of The Day (Politics)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 284, 285, 286 ... 300, 301, 302  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

It is pretty obvious that the reward should go to the police for coming up with the brilliant idea that the public were unlikely to want to help get a escaped terrorist off the streets without getting financial compo.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I Trust You Spotted It No127

he was apprehended in Northolt on Saturday morning - not long after a plain-clothes police officer pulled him off a bike on a canal towpath.

There's no canal in Northolt that I know of so it seems that a 'tec/off-duty cop stood on a towpath holding his arm up. As Khalife tried to ride round him (on a towpath!) our Boy Not In Blue could only push the bike over, whereupon Our Boy In Kitchen Whites ran off with PC "could only" Plod after him, as Britain's Most Wanted disappeared over the bank and far away. Though the forces of law and order did have a bike at his disposal.

So the search had to begin all over again. That's what you get when you single-handedly challenge someone honed by the Royal Signals in all the latest laptop martial arts.
Send private message
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
There's no canal in Northolt that I know of.


Absolutely none at all. Apart, that is, from the biggest canal in London, the Grand Union Canal. That's the same one that goes within a mile of where you live.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Well, I've landed at Northolt airport and you haven't, so there.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

But AE-ists note. The rest of my post still has some merit but anyone who knows their way around the canals of of west London would never have spotted it. The Tyranny of Knowledge as we call it.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

The floods in Libya may have taken the world (and the Libyans) by surprise but it would not have been a shock to veterans of the Eighth Army, fighting Rommel's Panzerarmee back and forth across the Western Desert. Every night the call would go out: "Don't pitch your tents in the wadi, lads." "Why not, sarge? It keeps us out of sight and out of the Khamsin." "Because you'll end up in the Mediterranean if it rains."
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Wiley has been turned down for the lead in "Che" "The Long Whiskered Martyr."

They have decided to cast some unknown called Russell Brand, apparently he has got more social followers.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

With it looking like a 2024 Biden Trump presidential race, it seems like just the right time for David Duke to throw his robe and hood into the ring.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

This HS2 business is getting more interesting by the day. The current situation could hardly be worse: Old Oak Common to Birmingham for a hundred billion. "Who wants to go to Old Oak Common?" "Who wants to go to Brum twenty minutes ahead of time?" That was never the problem, it was London to the north that was the problem HS2 was meant to solve.

The real revelation was Ben Chu at the Newsnight wall showing how much laying a mile of track costs in Britain as compared with everywhere else. It wasn't even close. We must be using solid gold rails. Though it transpired it was all down to Nimbyism, but not necessarily human Nimbyism

"There's a vole colony in the way."
"Put HS2 in a tunnel and quadruple the cost."
"That means a mole colony is in the way."
"Shift the tunnel and double the cost again."
"There's no voles there, we can put it on the surface."
"Too late, we've hired the diggers."
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Just because he makes you vomit is no reason to join in the Russell Brand hue-and-cry. It will turn out to be the old, old story. Vaguely charismatic showbiz figure gets women to do what they otherwise probably wouldn't do, they regret doing it and are blaming him. The prospect of a bit of cash isn't a disincentive either.

When are people going to realise sex is gross by its nature. That's why I won't have it in the house. Not for some time.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

When are bounders going to realise that their behaviour will always create a public hue and cry as these days proper Gentlemen are no longer able to protect the fairer sex by giving these cads a public whipping just in case things were not consensual.

These days we are expected to passively look on whilst Brand makes money by boasting about fucking so and so's granddaughter, and then worry if the presumption of innocence is not being applied when other women come forward to complain about non consensual sex.

Brand, rather than complaining about his lot, should feel very happy to live in an enlightened age where we have treatments for Sexually transmitted diseases' as in olden times Nature would have long ago taken its rightful revenge, and so these old allegations would be irrelevant.

Seriously, what does he expect. Folks to feel sorry for him?
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I hate to say it but I agree with Suella Braverman

As one of the moving lights behind the 1951 Refugees Convention, it's up to us to call a new conference to hammer out a set of rules that fit the world of 2023. Not just refugees, but asylum seekers and economic migrants. You only had to watch Channel 4's coverage of Braverman's speech to show why. Who did they choose to interview in order to show Suella in a poor light? A Nigerian lesbian given refugee status because she feared for her life in Nigeria.

* I challenge Channel 4 News to seek out all the people who have been crossing either the Mediterranean or the English Channel and find a lesbian, never mind a Nigerian lesbian, never mind a Nigerian lesbian in fear of her life if she stays in Nigeria.
* And yet... we should grant refugee status to anybody who is in fear of their life in their country of origin.
* And yet... and yet... that doesn't mean the United Kingdom should give such a person refugee status. If they are already in a safe country, there they should stay. And the new Convention will get them sent back there.

All that remains is to sift out refugees from economic migrants. That's simple enough. Stick all new arrivals in one giant holding pen. Genuine refugees won't mind -- they seek only safety. Economic migrants will mind so much they won't even come. Soon enough there'll only be genuine refugees in it and they can be welcomed into the bosom of Mother Britain.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

As one of the moving lights behind the 1951 Refugees Convention, it's up to us to call a new conference to hammer out a set of rules that fit the world of 2023


I can see what will happen, it will turn out of course that everyone, including countries like UK, the conference holders will have to listen to the countries who are actually taking by far the most and concerned about the impact on their countries.

Let's take a look at currently who accommodates by far the the most Refugees already.

10 Iran (Afghans) 840,000 nearly all Afghans.

9 Ethiopia (South Sudanese) 867,000

8 Bangledesh (Rohingya) 929,000

7 Sudan (South Sudanese) 1.1 million

6 Poland (Ukranians) 1.2 million

5 Russia (Russo Ukranians) 1.45 million

4 Uganda (South Sudan Congolese) 1.5 million

3 Pakistan (Afghans) 1.6 million

2 Germany (All sorts) 2.2 million

1 Turkey (Syrians and others ) 3.6 million refugees and rising.

Britain currently has a total of about 240,000

These countries will agree with good old UK that the refugee should not have the choice of where he ends up.... "wise words, British Home Secretary...... but surely all countries should henceforward take a fair share of the total number, and the refugees will then go wherever they are sent, providing that country is safe"

Brilliant.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I can see what will happen, it will turn out of course that everyone, including countries like UK, the conference holders will have to listen to the countries who are actually taking by far the most and concerned about the impact on their countries.

Mebbe, but the countries on your list, save Germany, have no clout so, if necessary we can ignore them, call it the European Convention or whatever. The point about the people on your list is that they are genuine refugees so the chief problem of the current situation -- the admixture of economic migrants -- doesn't arise.

These countries will agree with good old UK that the refugee should not have the choice of where he ends up....

With the exception of Germany all these countries demonstrate what happens to real refugees. They flee across the nearest border and plonk themselves down for the duration. I agree Britain does well out of this situation but that's the way world crumbles.

but surely all countries should henceforward take a fair share of the total number

Absolutely not. We've seen over and over again that countries won't and they won't sign up to a convention if they have to, and if they do they won't honour it, and if they do, the refugees will be given the coldest of welcomes. If there is an obligation on signatories to pay their share of the costs of the hosting countries, then fair enough.

and the refugees will then go wherever they are sent, providing that country is safe

If countries want to take some of the refugees that's great but otherwise, see above.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

GB News Shock Horror

Let's get clear what actually happened:
1. A blonde, reasonably attractive woman journalist says something mildly challenging about men on a lunchtime talkshow
2. On an evening talkshow a reasonably unattractive man took issue and said consequently he wouldn't want to sleep with her and nor would any other man.

It was standard knockabout minority channel talkshow stuff, witnessed by absolutely miniscule audiences of the kind who respectively
1. quite enjoy women saying disobliging things about men and
2. quite enjoy men saying disobliging things about women.
Nobody could possibly be offended by anything said unless they were determined to be. Since, in UK2023, everyone is determined to be offended by anything they've been told is offensive, the nation is currently in meltdown.

I find that offensive.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 284, 285, 286 ... 300, 301, 302  Next

Jump to:  
Page 285 of 302

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group